And which way do those charities lean - to the left or to the right? Hmmm? And have any of those charities made any contributions to her campaign or the DNC?
The word "Return" implies you brought it back to the place you got it. Mr. Hsu is NOT a charity, so it wasn't "Returned" to him. Could it be she "Returned" it the way she "Defines that term"?
2007-09-13 00:34:05 · 8 answers · asked by Jim C 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So far no one has correctly answered my question. Hmmm....wonder why?
2007-09-13 00:57:55 · update #1
Oh yeah, those tax write-offs... Likely, the ones who benefit her the most. :)
Here's a link:
2007-09-13 00:55:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The money should go back to the Woodstock guy that Hsu stole the $40 million form.
You know....the Woodstock millionaire (Rosenman) whose daughter invited Chelsea to Woodstock '94.
Gee....what a coinky dink. A rich acquaintance of the Clintons gives $40 mil to some unknown asian guy so he can donate it to Hillary and other Democrats.
Do these asian businessmen scandals happen to anyone other than the Clintons? Can you trust Hillary not to sell America out to China like BJ did?
PS, I love how the HIll defenders just pass this off as no big deal or 'poor Hillary'.
Screw that. She was warned about this guy in several e-mials from Jack Cassidy, and nobody gets close to the Clintons without the Secret Service doing a background check that would have certainly alerted them to who Mr Hsu was and that he had an outstanding warrant.
Hillary Knew. Don't even try to play it off like it was an innocent mistake.
Typical of a Democrat though. There is no moral equivalency between Republicans and Democrats.
A Republican taps his foot in an airport restroom and he has to resign. Hillary takes $850,000 of money she knows is tainted and it's all good. William Jefferson is busted with $90,000 in bribe money in his freezer and he gets re-elected - never is pressured to step down.
2007-09-13 07:43:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I was under the impression that the donations were being returned to the people who made them, and I hope that the IRS and the FBI investigate every last one of them. At the beginning, the Hillary Reichs Chancellery announced that they were giving $23K to charity but I have yet to have been able to find out which one. Whatever it is, you can bet that Bonnie & Clyde Clinton will have turned it into a profit for themselves somehow.
2007-09-13 07:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I could care less which charities... I actually don't care if she even returns the money or gives any of it to charity. I hate Hillary but every candidate has shady contacts and shady dealings in campaign fundraising. Let's get over this because it will eventually happen to one of your guys... it always does.
If you don't like Hillary then find something substantive to criticize her with (like her platform).... not using the word "return." That just looks nit picky.
2007-09-13 07:40:48 · answer #4 · answered by cattledog 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary........Return...... Money? HAAAAAAAA !!
Bubba would grow a set of nuts and slap the change outta her cofers. Please ....look at her and tell me with a straight face she wouldn't steal a blindmans' cane? Hint : The money aint gone no where. Ever heard of the pea and shells game?
Con artist use it to dupe the un-suspecting.
2007-09-13 08:05:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You haven't heard the latest she is going to keep it.
All the donors have to do is say Yes it is their money.
2007-09-13 07:39:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG....
It's a good thing Dems don't need to scrutinize republican funding... we know where that all comes from!
2007-09-13 07:40:42 · answer #7 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on what the meaning of "return" is, and perhaps on what the meaning of "is" is.
2007-09-13 07:53:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋