The Los Angeles Times revealed that the Clinton campaign had been warned that fundraiser Norman Hsu was involved in a suspicious ponzi scheme
At an appearance in New York this week, Clinton vowed that her campaign would "continue to analyze all contributions and take action if that's warranted."
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-hsu1sep01,0,7770103.story
2007-09-12 21:22:45 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
The Chinese have long had a disturbing relationship with the Democratic Party. Far back as '77 it was the Grandfather of Communist and Terrorist Appeasement himself, and the second most destructive president America has ever suffered, Jimbo Carter, who signed the papers that would ultimately allow China to control both sides of the Panama Canal.
Remember Libby: one cannot separate 'Chinese business interests' from the group who truly controls all that China does-- The People's Liberation Army.
Let's move forward to the '90s and look at a few acts of 'liberal patriotism' that made Carter's protege--Bill Clinton--the most dangerous president America has ever had the misfortune of enduring.
Anyone recall a particular seaport deal situated in Long Beach, California?
I do.
Clinton and his Boy Wonder back-roomed this treason with a company called Hutchinson Port Holdings. Don't see the crime? Well, HPH was headed by a fellow named Li Ka-shing, who in turn was doing more than sharing General Wu's Spicy Kung-Pao Chicken with the People's Liberation Army.
Add to this Bill and Al trading a few spec-sheets pertaining to military missile technology in exchange for receiving a 'happy ending' while yucking it with the commies...
But hey, maybe I'm making too much out of it all.
I'm sure Hsu is just a private citizen.
Yeah for the Clinton's and Yeah for Liberalism!
Edit:
Sorry for the Run-On Paragraph; I wrote that ponderous thing before work!
2007-09-12 22:37:26 · answer #1 · answered by illiberal Illuminati 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course they knew all along what Hsu was,but he brought in hundreds of thousands in contributions,so they simply didn't care. The Clintons have proven time and time again that they are for sale to the highest bidder. At this point if there were any justice the FEC would subpoena all of her records for an in depth audit,but that kind of action will not be taken because of who she is. But I'm sure that her campaign coffers are well stocked with questionable or outright illegal campaign contributions.
2007-09-12 22:41:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
with any luck they'll the two flow away! My information, however, is they're re-aligning themselves with the comparable previous drained people who bill utilized in his campaigns, i.e., obnoxious onion head Carville and in simple terms as obnoxious Paul Begalia. I heard Hillary's co-marketing campaign chairwoman communicate this afternoon on Fox information (Sheila Jackson Lee from Houston) and in accordance to her Hillary stands out as the nominee. undergo in suggestions, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, that it is the comparable lady who asked NASA in the event that they'd deliver the Mars rover motor vehicle over to work out if the flag the astronauts planted grew to become into nevertheless status. (It grew to become into planted on the moon, yet this gal has no clue whilst it is composed of something that demands intelligence).
2016-10-10 12:00:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Clinton's are noted for this kind of misdeeds. I even think that they may of tried to help Hsu into the next world. If not I think that he was so afraid they were going to, they he himself tried to kill himself. Prison will not shelter him from the long arm of those that wish to control the world.
2007-09-13 06:27:02 · answer #4 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Clinton's have been taking money from mysterious, shadowy Chinese men since before 1986, so they've known for at least 21 years. They were just hoping that no one else knew.
2007-09-12 23:52:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Democrat Candidate is almost certainly going to win the next presidential election. If Hillary is sufficently corrupt, it won't be her.
President Obama or President Edwards will do just fine.
2007-09-12 22:56:29 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Bad Day 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is the Poster Girl of political whores. She'll take $$ from anyone, anytime.. Hillary will only take action if she gets caught.
2007-09-12 22:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by maxman71 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"continue to analyze all contributions and take action if that's warranted."
Liberal PC speech for " we'll return the cash when the guy gets caught"....
2007-09-12 21:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They knew. Money is money.
2007-09-12 21:30:06 · answer #9 · answered by Puppy Zwolle 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋