Do we really need to question the books or doctrines or just follow them without any doubt ?
2007-09-12 16:59:28 · 7 answers · asked by The More I learn The More I'm Uneducated 5 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
the books or doctrines have been generated by arguments the fact that doubts still remain means more books will be writtten. When all doubts are settled either it will be brainless society or nirvana, we are far from it.
2007-09-16 08:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes indeedy, we need to question books and doctrines; I was raised to follow them without doubt, but doubt sowed flourishing seeds early on, and I've wanted to double-check things ever since.
So the 'arguments or contradictions' in r & s and philosophy are important, to answer your question. We always need fresh input on everything! I'm glad to get it, anyway...
2007-09-12 17:10:47 · answer #2 · answered by LK 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In R&S, follow without doubt. In Philosophy, question.
2007-09-12 17:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by phil8656 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Had we followed those books , Vedas, doctrines etc. No science would have been possible as you see now. No human would have got better housing,food, education, road, rail, air.
Doubt is the root of Inquiry. whether it is in material world ,or spiritual world. Doubt is must.
2007-09-16 22:06:51 · answer #4 · answered by krishprud@yahoo.co.in_KISHORLAL 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you have enough doubt and ask a few hard questions you will finally be free and become an atheist.
2007-09-12 17:10:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without discrimination no R&S/Phil. What is happening with Rama's bridge? Political
2007-09-13 05:40:44 · answer #6 · answered by Muthu S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt of everything my friend.
: )
2007-09-12 17:09:13 · answer #7 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋