gone 24 hours w/out eating????? is it bad to do that??
2007-09-12 16:29:25 · 18 answers · asked by green eyed irish girl 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No I havent, and yes, its very bad.*
2007-09-12 16:35:22 · answer #1 · answered by Check this out! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i have, even longer than that. Now I prefer a mono diet instead of fasting, almost the same result
Everyone says it's bad and can be dangerous for some. A friend of mine did that and blames fasting for his heart attack.
2007-09-12 23:51:31 · answer #2 · answered by andyg77 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Not a good idea to do it habitually, but once in a great while it shouldn't do any lasting harm. Of greater concern would be to go without water for that length of time.
2007-09-12 23:35:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but not because I wanted to. And yes it's bad.
2007-09-12 23:33:11 · answer #4 · answered by Nico 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did the 40 hour famine once to raise money for hungry children.. It's a charity thing... If you don't do it all the time it isn't bad for you...
2007-09-12 23:32:31 · answer #5 · answered by Cato Says "Kalamaloo" 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes and it's not bad if you don't do it all the time.
2007-09-12 23:33:27 · answer #6 · answered by Jai 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have one several occasions. It is bad from the standpoint of your blood sugar level crashing.
2007-09-12 23:43:17 · answer #7 · answered by Severus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes i have and yes it is. not eating slows down your metabolism and deprives you of nutrients.
2007-09-12 23:35:33 · answer #8 · answered by Lov'n IT! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no and yes,
i get hungry...even though i eat alot im like good size [[u knoe not skinny but not buff]]
2007-09-12 23:33:50 · answer #9 · answered by Sean 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and yes
2007-09-12 23:31:45 · answer #10 · answered by hairspray queen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋