Liberals have made their choice known, I want to hear about yours
2007-09-12 16:20:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'll TaKE THE U.S. GROUND FORCES COMMADER IN IRAQ!!! in a TIME OF WAR!!!! WITH EYES ON, As a soldier, I believe his word over, George Soros, Harry Ried, Daily Kos, Bill Clinton, didn't he take an oath???? prejury charges, getting his law license ripped away a first for a U.S. President, and the Generals word over Moveon.org, is that good enough for
2007-09-12 16:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by dez604 5 · 8⤊ 4⤋
Authority? Gen. Petraeus.
But the most reliable? Probably George Soros. Afterall, Petraeus has responsibilities to the White House, to the Military and his soldiers.
And, he's being asked to comment on something he is directly involved with. It's like asking a mother about her son. Or asking a chef to explain whether his banana bread is any good.
And, George Soros has less reason to exaggerate than David Petraeus, doesn't he?
2007-09-12 22:45:37 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Bad Day 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Gen. Petraeus, he has seen first hand the action and eye-witness accounts of what is going on in the region, and knows far more concerning what needs to be done, than George Soros would even begin to think about.
I have far more respect for Gen. Petraeus, than I do George Soros any day.
George Soros is a traitor to the United States, along with Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Jack Murtha, and a slew of others.
2007-09-12 16:34:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
General Petraeus: militarily authoritative. George Soros: militant authoritarian
2007-09-12 16:55:57 · answer #4 · answered by reaganite27 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course Petraeus.
However, I might draw you attention to the fact that Soros is noted for bringing down countries through destroying their money markets. Remember always Soros is foreigner and a devote communist...for everyone but for himself.
2007-09-13 06:44:20 · answer #5 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I find Petraeus to be a source but I also take into context USMC ret. Gen. Jones chairman of the Iraqi Security Forces Independent Assessment Commission and I would also take into consideration the independent commision done by Gen. Peter Pace
I also take the GAO study to be a very big factor into forming my opinions about Iraq.
whats with the thumbs down? I thought reps take generals over politicians? Those two are also four star generals...
2007-09-12 16:26:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
If you're an ignorant liberal, then you're right, they've already made their choice. Liberals are the 21% that trusts congress to revolve things in Iraq. The 68% of those who trust the military to solve the problems in Iraq are those who realize how dangerous liberals are. I like to think of liberals as the Tinea Pedia of the human race. A more gutless group of $*@% clowns this nation has never seen.
2007-09-12 16:32:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
General Petraeus!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-13 06:41:24 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why bother asking, the insane liberals are going to agree with anything soros says.
2007-09-12 17:13:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The libs picked Soros because he's anti-military just like they are. So any 'general' like Soros pretty much guarantees the proliferation of anti-American actions going unchecked and America's descent into socialism and a France-like 'tail between our legs' stature.
EDIT: I just love how the moveon.org wannabe-witty ad has opened the psychological floodgates for all the wimps out there who have been waiting to spew their anti-American military rhetoric. That shows what followers they really are..... come on, come up with an original idea and stop taking your cues from left-wing web sites.
2007-09-12 16:27:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋