Can Congress force Bush to start bringing troops home? If so, how?

Answer 1

Yes

Dodd said he would not sign any war funding bills that did not include a date certain for the return of all troops.

I'm not sure if he has surrendered his presidential campaign to Hillary or if he just wants to surrender the country to Al Queda.

Anyway, if he gets enough people to vote with him and cut off the money, they have forced Bush to bring home the troops.

The Democrats did the same thing in 1974 to Vietnam. They cut off the funds, China and Russia renewed aid to the north and Saigon fell.

There is no reason not to expect the same thing wouldn't happen in Iraq vis a vis Saudi Arabia and Iran.

If you don't care what happens to Iraq, vote for Dodd. He's your man.

Answer 2

The only way to make Bush bring the troops home is to cut off the funding for the war. Congress is in charge of providing the funding for the war. If they don't provide the funds, Bush has no alternative but to bring them home. This is what the Congress had to do during the Viet Nam War. It is the only thing that ended that fiasco.

Answer 3

The democratic congress will not actually DO anything but criticize our efforts in Iraq.
They want desperately to maintain the illusion that this is Bush's war. If they actually stepped up to the plate and DID something meaningful as relates to this war, such as cutting funding or passing a troop withdrawal bill, they wouldn't be able to spin their way out of the inevitable consequences of an American defeat in Iraq as a result of their own policies.

Answer 4

They can cut off funding. But Congress does not want to end the war. If that were to happen they would have nothing to dump on Bush about. Congress is paying to keep it going and Hillary already said that it will probably go on for a few years into her Presidency.

Answer 5

They can defund the war. I'd do it in a heart beat and wouldn't care one bit about the tsunami of Fox News attacks that would soon follow.

Fox News would run images of the Iraq civil war casualties 24/7 that would most likely occur. They shun showing casualties while Bush is trying to stall for more time on the war.

Answer 6

They could cut off funding but they won't. It's all political bullshit. The Democrats have no intention of pulling the troops out. They know how valuable it is to US interests to have troops and bases in the Middle East. They are simply trying to pander to the extreme left wing of their party. You know, the anti-war nut jobs. We will be in Iraq for a very, very long time. Guaranteed! So you might want to get used to it and ignore all the political crap back and forth about pulling them out bla bla bla....its meaningless.

Answer 7

He the two has a God-like complicated or is a Hitler-wannabe. Cheney is his little suitable hand imp and every person else that sings their praises. How can every person who calls themselves American sit down back and not making use of a care interior the worldwide devoid of thinking their President and have not have been given any voice is previous me. we ought to continually have had them out on their ears suitable after 9/11. in case you look on the info and the consistent coverups and scandals interior the White domicile over who did what on 9/11 is obtrusive they understand who......themselves!! ask your self why FBI or whoever the brokers have been that took surveillance digital camera photos of the attack on the Pentagon from interior sight companies yet won't launch to the wide-unfold public how or why it surpassed off ought to make you think of....and that they only allowed one digital camera engaged on the front to the Pentagon with the incorrect date on it whilst the Pentagon is the main guard encumbered place with cameras and sensors everywhere. this is the fort Knox of all homes as far as risk-free practices stages yet they do no longer enable every person understand something. ask your self how can the twin towers explode into airborne dirt and dust and unfastened-fall in onto itself on the instant right down to this is footprint from the small fires and the attack above that did no longer final very long. Has there ever been any metallic/concrete construction ever give way so frivolously from hearth injury? NO. as nicely the incorrect construction collapsed first. Plus, WTC 7 collapsed the comparable way. They in no way demonstrate this interior the 9/11 Comission document. It grew to become into all planned from interior by ability of Bush and Cheney and Rice and all who kiss their you recognize what's for financial and political income. The blackouts in ny and powerdowns of all cameras and bomb sniffing dogs an evacutations of workers interior the towers and bldg. 7 till now 9/11 gave a lot of get entry to for those employed from interior to place detonation units interior the recommendations-blowing places to be monitored and activated from a secure area as quickly as all of us grew to become into of their places with their stupid interest faces on. The President and his imps have taken the lives of many those that day and it hasn't stopped ever on account that our troops have been long gone. It has to end someplace, sometime.

Answer 8

I think it would make them look pretty foolish, as they voted for the Iraq Liberation Act 360-38 which called for the regime change, military service, and humanatarian relief for the Iraqi's

Answer 9

Bush has been played by Bin Laden so badly

Answer 10

Yes.Cut off the funding.