2007-09-12 14:16:33 · 24 answers · asked by mohan k.s. . 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
~Definetely. my friend ....it's traditional 50 overs match~
2007-09-13 03:50:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
While Twenty/20 is more entertaining and excitring, it is purely batsman's game, whereas in 50 overs game, both the batsman and bowlers are getting equal opportunity to show their talent,. Hence, I consider 50 over match better
2007-09-13 01:20:06 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cricket has become fast and competitive game. 20 20 will be exciting and it is for the younger lot. In the coming years i guess the two types in cricket would be for 5 day test series and 20 20 one day. To my mind 50 overs may not remain popular. however personally I feel 50 overs should continue to give reasonable time for players to settle and play. But players will get used to speed.
2007-09-12 21:58:39 · answer #3 · answered by KAAL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50 over
2007-09-13 08:33:44 · answer #4 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50 over match is best to judge player's performance 20-20 cricket is only entertainment
2007-09-13 01:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by manish b 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50 over match is better.
20-20 is only batsman game
2007-09-13 03:16:43 · answer #6 · answered by Rahul Dravid 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are great.
T20 is for enthusiasm, speed, hitting, fun & entertainment. But ODIs are definately for talent. Bowlers may bat well in T20 too Bcoz itzz not hard for them to play out of the fence. Technique isnt much important for T20. I think the players should be reduced as 10 wickets are too much. Itzz hard for the bowling side to claim so many in just 120 balls(there are exceptioin like NZ & Scootland). So itzz entirely a batting game.
2007-09-13 01:29:50 · answer #7 · answered by THE RJ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20/twenty over match is better .
2007-09-13 02:49:34 · answer #8 · answered by anita anu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ODI is the real talent for any sort of the dept. like bowling, fielding,Keeping etc., otherthan batting & found great players. In 20-20 not like that only batting blows is more exceptations.So,ODI is good for all & better than 20-20.
2007-09-12 23:04:58 · answer #9 · answered by nethaji - 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i like 50 overs better... i guess i am not used to the 20 over one yet....
20-20 tilts a bit too much towards the batsmans side i think...
i personally like tests the best.... it tests every aspect of a players game...
2007-09-12 22:19:18 · answer #10 · answered by Proud 2 b Indian 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
50 overs is great
But I think 20/20 will finally us some real wide competition not just aussie smashing the world
2007-09-12 21:27:40 · answer #11 · answered by ace j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋