and added, "I hate people like that".
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=39235
2007-09-12 13:59:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Petraeus reports to Admiral Fallon who can call him anything he wishes.
2007-09-12 14:12:37 · update #1
His boss called it right! Thank you for the article, read it & was impress; although I felt all along that Petraeus was exactly what his boss, Admiral Fallon, called him! Everyone knew that Bush would not appoint someone who would tell him the truth, he wouldn't recognize it anyway!
2007-09-12 14:13:54 · answer #1 · answered by geegee 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet.
Anytime an article quotes a source then doesn't identify the source I dismiss it. Anybody can say anything then quote an un-named source.
Fallon told Petraeus that he considered him to be "an ***-kissing little chickenshit" and added, "I hate people like that", the sources say.
Before I believe this I would want to know who the source is.
2007-09-12 14:15:05 · answer #2 · answered by Bill 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't think any of us has any right to question anything any serviceman says about anything going on over there. We are not there, and the only information we get are skewed media views and political opinions, like they know anything at all. We should ignore statements like that and develop a support for our troops and what they are doing.
2007-09-12 14:34:18 · answer #3 · answered by J D 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I see the throngs of dem morons are out sharing what they've been told to say...
Your website is lying and by default you are a liar. So in answer to your question he didn't so put all thumbs down over there. Each one makes me laugh at you a little bit more. >>>>>>>>>
2007-09-12 15:37:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
An Admiral is not superior to a 4 star General, they would be equal in rank...
2007-09-12 14:08:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Inter Press? The Sources Say? The story underneath?
You are reaching so far you might just fall out of your boxers.
2007-09-12 14:08:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
He would be on the the receiving end of an Article 88 of the UCMJ
Contempt towards officials
2007-09-12 14:05:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
And whatever one general officer thinks of another has no relevance in this matter. The story said that this was a perception, an opinion. means little or nothing.
2007-09-12 14:07:17 · answer #8 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
How dare you insult the 'Saviour'? Lol
Interesting article.
2007-09-12 14:09:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Probably because he is. It is no secret that he has decided to be a toady for Bushco.
2007-09-12 14:08:27 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas B 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋