I am amazed when listening to the radio station what you can learn regards politics and our government. I am appaled by what comes out of Senator Hillary Clintons mouth.
The democrats are not much better running from the truth about the war on Iraq. Will you vote for Hillary?
I prefer Mitt Romney over her.
2007-09-12 10:17:07 · 15 answers · asked by angelikabertrand64 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I am not so certain why people must push their opinions about Mitt Romney of having 5 son's on this subject?
I think it has absolutley nothing to do with his 5 son's. There are many children of democratics and republicans in the government, who have not served and never served in the military. It's the proracative of this nation, that we can decide whether we want to serve or not! That's what I understand under Democracy. Not that we are forced to enter military. Rather we decide. So what if Mitt Romney has 5 sons. Look at the other son's that have never served. Look at Al Gore's son?
2007-09-12 11:49:45 · update #1
Lettie D I cannot BELIEVE you posted that about Romney!
JUST because he HAS kids doesn't mean he should or can force them to serve in the military... shame on you!
I support the war, I support our military, but I would NEVER FORCE my son to serve. I'd be proud if he did. PERIOD.
Shameful
2007-09-12 11:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan~ Unapologetic Conservative 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Let me state that I didn't hear Hannity's radio show today so I can't honestly speak in regards to what you are referencing.
But I will not be voting for Hillary but it has nothing to do with what Sean Hannity, Alan Colmes, Al Franken, Bill Press, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly or the rest fo the political pundits say. Understand that each of these people have a job to do, that job is to get the highest ratings possible so that there employer can charge more for advertising time during the shows that each of these people put on. None of them have any obligation to tell the truth and the majority of all the shows is based upon opinion and not facts. Also please notice that I included liberal hosts and conservative hosts both. It makes no difference what your view points are you are on the radio or the tv to do 1 thing, get people to watch or listen to you.
2007-09-12 10:48:07 · answer #2 · answered by labken1817 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They honestly voted on anything? Did they ought to take a vote that the advert existed? I imply particularly? What used to be it for besides? I bet we can pay attention extra later however what outcome could this wonderful transfer create? More discord amongst Americans in a time of struggle? Any of them discover divide and overcome is the groundwork of communism? Any historical past prof can instruct you that. Kerry I assume as with Hill. Kennedy has not more to lose, Reid? All scorching air to mislead a country. And this is a Presidential season. Connect the dots. As if they've the years of carrier that Petraus has had? I am ill of those Monday morning quarterbacks short of in charge the avid gamers at the discipline while they may be able to do not anything in leadership to furnish a sport plan. No answers simply court cases. All in a global wherein the dangerous men are looking ever so cautiously. DO they care? Hell no. It is political manuvering. Clear and practical. Thank you.
2016-09-05 11:46:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way I'll ever cast a vote for Hillary is if I'm on a jury, and she probably won't want my vote then.
Lettie, I'm a veteran. I may not speak for all veterans on this, but I'm sure that most will agree with me when I say that I volunteered to serve so others wouldn't have to. If that includes Mitt Romney's children, then I'm fine with that. It probably includes you, too.
2007-09-12 10:55:50 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Was never going to vote for her before I saw her speeches. And I agree with you on Mitt Romney
2007-09-12 10:57:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She never had my vote to begin with. I have been watching her since before Fox News went on the air in 1996. Since 1993, in fact, when she unveiled that healthcare plan fiasco that not even a Democrat-majority-led Congress would support.
Good post, Joey. This is one of the reasons I registered Independent when I moved down here to CA. I can have a say in the elections put forth by the party in power by choosing to vote in their primaries and then voting for what I want in the general.
2007-09-12 10:26:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
I would never have voted for her anyway! In fact I encourage all conservatives to vote in the Democratic Primary. Vote for someone completely unelectable, then in the national election vote for whomever the Republicans nominate. Take support away from Hillary and Barrack.
2007-09-12 10:25:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yea she is a more corrupt politician than Mitt. On the face at least.
Electing is just about voting for who you think the least corrupt the politician is.
2007-09-12 10:44:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I would rather have the fleas of a thousand camels infest my privates than to vote for that witch. A vote for her is a vote for Communism.
2007-09-12 10:37:37 · answer #9 · answered by Realist 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I wasn't voting for her before
2007-09-12 10:44:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋