catholic jesus
idk if there is a differance butt i thought that i would tell you
2007-09-12 09:19:07 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
This is not a funny question and if yr trying to be funny...yr NOT!
Our Lord and Savior, the Son of Man, did not have ANY possessions. He lived an impoverished life i guess u could say and relied on the kindness of others. But that kindness only goes so far huh? Even today.
He most likely wore a plain robe like thing. Very simple. sandals i assume. but the main thing is he wore NOTHING when He was scourged and crucified in the most bloody, heinous, act of violence and brutality known to man. Why cant people understand that He is supposed to be a mystery? He died. FOR MAN. And what did man do to Him? What are they STILL doing to Him. I am Catholic and I assume U R not because you asked this question. But maybe youre young and just simply want to know about Him. He was a MODEST man.He owned nothing. He had no home. Nothing. We are not SUPPOSED to know what He looked like. No man will ever see His face on earth...until He comes back. But then it wont matter what he is wearing. Will it?~God Bless.~Stacy
2007-09-12 09:31:36 · answer #1 · answered by JennyJennyJenny 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, Jesus would've worn robes and stuff. Sorry, i can't get much more detailed than that, because they're pretty plain things, robes. I'd assume that he wore robes, sandals, and whatever passed as underwear in those days, and that was it. Perhaps a pack of some sort, in which he could keep provisions so that he wouldn't starve or anything on long trips. I really can't get much more detailed, since this only as much as can be assumed from logic. In brief, he would've carried only the basics he needed to survive, as did the people of that day (because of the fact that that was all they had back then, basically- what they needed). Logic rules! By the way, there was only one Jesus, and it's not like he carried a wardrobe with him or anything. They just wore the most basic of basics, according to historians. Nothing fancy or anything like that.
2007-09-12 09:28:34 · answer #2 · answered by Brian H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus dressed in the 'common clothes of the time and area' ... he wore a 'robe' (like an ankle length dress, with a rope or leather belt, but EXTREMELY plain) and 'sandals' ... which is the way most of the people in the area we now know as Israel dressed when Jesus was alive. The Roman army wore 'armor' and 'shorter tunics' and 'loincloths' and sandals but ONLY because that was their 'uniform' ...
And there was only ONE 'Jesus' ... ALL 'Christian religions' come from that one man who was also 'god' on Earth.
2007-09-12 09:24:11 · answer #3 · answered by Kris L 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're seriously comparing "Jesus Christ Superstar" to Jesus Of Nazareth, the Savior of the World? No - Jesus was not a cross dresser. It is recorded by several Apostles that he wore robes and sandals. I hope that other people haven't made a decision of who Jesus is based on this movie, I have a feeling that that was the director's goal. :( God bless!
2016-05-17 23:54:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
catholic Jesus? Jesus was Jewish!
any way Jesus wore the cloths appropriate for that era. i think if he lived today (i mean as a human) he would probably wear a t- shirt and jeans. and why not a green Mohawk? if i could rate answers id give it a thumb up. JESUS PARTIED!
2007-09-12 10:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ACTUALLY, enough with these stupid answers.
He didn't wear any of these senseless things mentioned. He was totally in with the new, like OUR new. He liked to wear Abercromie & Fitch, Hollister, Louis Vitton, etc. He also liked to carry around Dooney & Bourke "manbags." In some pictures you can actually see some Ed Hardy up in the mix. He was a very trendy guy, always new what was "cool" even if he had a futuristic mind and maybe laughed at by villagers. We all know Jesus was in with the new.
2007-09-12 09:27:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
A Martha Stuart Sheet from Kmart.
2007-09-12 09:22:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It would probably be more accurate to say, "Jesus of the Christian Faith" or, more simply, "Jesus Christ". Regardless, we understood what you meant without resorting to superfluous details. Furthermore, this question would have been better suited under one of the "Religion" forums.
Regardless, check out the links, below.
2007-09-12 09:40:29 · answer #8 · answered by skaizun 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no difference; Jesus is Jesus.
He wore robes, a tunic and sandals.
2007-09-12 09:21:09 · answer #9 · answered by Mandy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was a Jew..hence "King of the Jews". He wore the same thing everyone else back then wore.
2007-09-12 09:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Vwgirl18 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋