English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Presidential candidate Kucinich going to Syria declaring he will not go to greet the troops in Irak cause US is illegally there.

A few months ago b i t c h Nancy Pelosi went there too to play the statesman with US's enemies.

2007-09-12 09:07:10 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

15 answers

The Democrat's approach to defending America is just juvenile.
They only want to win elections and they are foolish enough to think the path to political victory is to take a stand that is the opposite of any stand the Republicans take.
The Republicans always take a pro-America, pro-National Defense approach.
To be opposite, the Democrats think they have to be Anti-America, ANTI-National Defense!
That approach is TREASONOUS by definition!
If that isn't the reason for their betrayal, then they ARE traitors.
They have to grow up and take the LEAD in being pro-America and Pro-Defense or they will keep loosing elections until there is NO MORE Democratic Party of any significant importance.
I usually vote Republican because I am pro-America, NOT because I identify myself as a Republican.
If the Democratic Party changes, I might vote for them. I'm NOT happy with much of what the Republicans do.
I AM a Conservative and I feel I have NO good representation in either existing branch of Congress!

2007-09-12 09:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by Philip H 7 · 4 4

of direction no longer yet they may be the celebration with sounder questioning. purely time will tell. to apply words like appeasement, resign and treason to describe dissent does not serve the int rests of demo cray. they're in simple terms a thank you to attempt to pass guilt extremely than accepting that blunders have been made and accepting duty.

2016-11-15 01:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by riveria 4 · 0 0

I find your statement treasonous - just as bush holds his ground in Iraq and stands by his so called principles so does kucinich who is totally against the war - the administration has sent people there as well I believe it was rice who last visited syria if my memories right- I am not a democrat but I refuse to state they are an enemy (as misguided as they are )when we know our enemies are not fellow americans but a small group of muslim extremists

2007-09-12 10:23:26 · answer #3 · answered by rooster 5 · 2 3

They aren't, despite your claims. I consider it much more treasonous to lie to the American people about the reasons for starting a war. Bush lied in his 2003 SOTU Address about the yellow cake intel. He'd been informed more than once by the CIA that the intel was bogus, yet he used it anyway to help convince us all that we were in imminent danger from Hussein. There was nothing improper about Pelosi going to Syria as Speaker of the House, spin it anyway you please. Kucinich is a nutjob in my opinion and hardly represents the whole of the Democratic Party. Nice try though.

2007-09-12 09:34:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Yes

2007-09-13 05:17:34 · answer #5 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0 1

Remember the old saying, you can please some of the people some of the time? The Dems are too busy living by another motto - The squeeky wheel gets the oil. Unless Moderates and Conservatives start getting loud enough to be heard, its going to continue getting worse.

The Uber Libs are going to get much worse before they get better.

2007-09-12 09:16:20 · answer #6 · answered by MD 4 · 4 4

Look at the Liberals who support this man? The Syrians are supporting suicide bombers who are killing our troops.

2007-09-12 14:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 2 1

Look let's all just stand up and face the music.

They are all F*king Lunatics taking advantage of the American Public.

All of the DEM/REP bashing is just keeping us all busy while the other hand is blatantly screwing us.

Wake up.

2007-09-12 09:17:48 · answer #8 · answered by Dionannan 5 · 3 4

No, they have not.

Nothing you mentioned is treasonous.
Revealing the name of a covert CIA agent is. The CIA director said she had covert status.

Why are you so Anti-American?
Why do you hate America so much that you call our elected officials such vile names?

2007-09-12 09:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 3 4

I think you need to look up the words "evolution" and "treason" in a dictionary. Then I think you need to move out of your parent's basement and get yourself a life.

2007-09-12 09:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers