While I realize many people are having accounts suspended from unnecessary and unwarranted claims, how is it that moderators choose to reply to contestors AFTER you've posted your question?
I posted a message to appeal my suspension almost 3 hours ago. Someone else posted an appeal for a suspension as well about 1 hour ago and has already received a message stating claims.
Do they just ignore people with legit claims and answer everyone elses?
This is extremely infuriating to say the least. Should my answer come before those who post appeals after mine or do I get the luxury of sitting and waiting because Yahoo researched my appeal and found no wrong?
What gives?
2007-09-12
07:59:50
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
David; I know what I'm bound by. So I assume a person should be left in the dark when it comes to finding out why the suspension occured, right? All I want to know is what was violated. If it's legit I have no qualms, but if it's unwarranted than yeah I have a reason to be angry about it.
2007-09-12
08:10:08 ·
update #1