there is no pictures because there was no plane crash.
Measurements find that it was impossible for a plane of that type to cause a small hole like that. The building was still standing too perfectly and there was no plane debris ever found. it has been ignored by the media too.
It was a bomb. Most people know by now. It was a bomb inside the Pentagon, but naturally they try to cover it up.
I am not going to go talk forever on this but you have 2 choices:
Ignore them, think that's its all nonsense, support your government, believe the media and laugh at the evidence.
Or investigate the theory, question your government and media, and think for yourself.
2007-09-12 09:13:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Black Star Deceiver 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Four Points: 1. The Pentagon didn't have many cameras prior to 9/11; they relied on security officers. Why? The cameras didn't stop intruders. If you wanted to sneak into the Pentagon, which of these would stop you: a camera or an armed guard? 2. Surveillance cameras are designed to capture cars and people. Not planes fly 500+ miles per hour. I can't even get a clear photo of my kid on Halloween. 3. Is the release of "secret tapes" going to solve anything? We have high quality footage of Flight 175 hitting the World Trade Center, but there are still those that say there wasn't any plane. 4. There has only been ONE photo released of American Airlines Flight 587 crashing into the ground in Queens, NY. Guess what...it wasn't a clear picture. Is this a conspiracy too?
2016-05-17 22:40:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by marilyn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As wounded duck said, the cameras mounted at the location where the plane hit take pictures every 2 to 3 seconds and covers an area a couple hundred feet long. The plane hit the Pentagon going 560+ miles (you do the math how many feet per second that is).
For those with a penchant for conspiracy theories, please try to keep a simple fact in mind.....just because no visual (i.e. pictures, video) clues exist, this does not provide bona fide proof of a conspiratorial alternative. Look at all the other evidence before attempting to rip apart what you may think is a cover up.
2007-09-12 08:06:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by CHRISTOPHER K 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The wing of the A/c hit the lawn first and spun the plane into the building slicing thru floors and spreading a rapid flash fire. Just ask the widows and widower's whose loved ones were at work that day. One lady was down the hall from her sister is a separate office. She looked for the lady in the red dress. She was gone. Oprah did a special yesterday on 9/11 from New York which included each crime scene. Family members accounts. None of which included conspiracies. They need 7 mil more for their memorial u can contribute on Oprah .com.
Loose Change was created on a budget of less than $6.000
It was edited as loosely and quickly as to leave out information and add gaps and speculation. Time Magazine Google their reports.
You can create a buzz yet can not offer scientific proof of it's authenticity. Sadly, it takes only a headline to start a spark not any depth of information that points to facts. Thank you.
2007-09-12 07:27:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
maybe it was going 500miles an hour? Maybe the cameras were pointed at the building and grounds. Is this another one of those conspiracy whack-jobs that think it didn't happen? Why do you abbreviate the word pic...But spell out pentagon/security/building which all have 8 letters like pictures?
2007-09-12 07:56:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Raymond C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A plane did hit the Pentagon building on 9-11-01. Photos are irrelevant when you find the plane parts in the building.
2007-09-12 07:08:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
There are many pictures, none that you need to see. I am quite sickened by the CT's demeaning the deaths of thousands with your lies. I just wish I could say what I really want to.
2007-09-13 05:51:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bleh! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't like to watch it,show it.
It could demoralize and bring back other Traumas to the generals,hall officers and soldiers,relatives.
But maybe not the Baghdad street troops....they could be sympathetic somehow.
2007-09-12 07:11:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by amleth 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've seen pictures of the plane crash...they slowed it waaaaaay down.
And yes, the plane did hit the building.
Sorry "loose change", playing with the most feeble American minds is kind of cruel, in my opinion.
2007-09-12 07:13:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Yahoo Answer Angel 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
well when people die and plane parts are laying everywhere and there is a big hole in the side of the pentagon...I would think that a plane crashed into the side of it....why need pictures when it was all over the news.
2007-09-12 07:10:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by nashvillekat 6
·
3⤊
3⤋