Check out these facts
This is a comparison over the first 4yrs ONLY. I really don't know how he kept his job?
Median household income, change
Clinton: +1.7% per year
Bush: -1.6% per year
Number of Americans in poverty (average change per year)
Clinton: -800,000
Bush: +1.5 million
Number of Americans without health insurance
Clinton: +145,000
Bush: +1,885,000
Federal surplus/deficit (annual average):
Clinton: +$5 billion
Bush: -$350 billion
Clinton: GOT HIS POPSICKLE SUCKED!
Bush: Choked on Pretzel
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS!!!!
2007-09-12 05:43:07 · 10 answers · asked by Andre L 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton,hands down.
During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare rolls. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination.
2007-09-12 06:00:14 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am really no conspiracy theorist.I don't know about the Illuminati,Freemasons,NWO,
whatever,but I've been thinking lately.It doesn't appear to make much difference which party is in power,they seem to pursue the same agenda,a unified North America and control of the middle east.Bush Sr.proposed NAFTA,Clinton signed it,GW Bush continues to enact it.Carter's CIA created "radical Islam,Reagan funded it,Clinton Ignored sure chances,and Bush obviously doesn't care about capturing him.I think they have debates and elections to make us feel like we are part of the process,But the US agenda seems the same,regardless of who holds office.I hope NO ONE is blind enough to really think a democrat will pull us out of Iraq.It simply isn't going to happen.The US is part of the middle east and will remain so,regardless of the next presidents party.These agendas go back decades,makes you wonder
2007-09-12 06:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hmm...i would say what others have...you can feel the effect of a president long after he leaves office...i mean honestly you dems say that whoever is next has to clean up bushs mess...what about bush cleaning clintons mess....
Holy Cow: we were only made to believe the world was at peace...obviously you forgot about all the bombings at our embassies....the uss cole....the '93 trade center bombing....oh and news flash...there was a link b/t ramsey usef and the ok city bombing.......so i dont know of the peace you speak of....
2007-09-12 06:14:03 · answer #3 · answered by tll 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you not know that the effects of a president aren't felt for years after his end of office? The problems that Bush has had to deal with is the result of Clinton's screw up in office!
2007-09-12 05:51:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
When Clinton left office, gas was 1.46 and we were at peace with the world. Enough said.
2007-09-12 05:49:59 · answer #5 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton is the one that sold out our future with his free trade agreements. Thats where all our jobs went.
Neither has really done us much good.
2007-09-12 06:03:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is much better....these numbers mean that Bush had to clean up Clinton's garbage.
2007-09-12 05:52:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Ha ha
2007-09-12 05:50:24 · answer #8 · answered by Hoolahoop 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
NO contest there BILL CLINTON! is best!
2007-09-12 05:50:53 · answer #9 · answered by robert x 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
obviously clinton.
rhodes scholar vs college drunk
2007-09-12 05:50:15 · answer #10 · answered by nukemtwox 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋