It shows how dum she is after Bill was caught taking illegal money it looks like even she would have had better sense doesnt it?
2007-09-12 05:18:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
A large percentage of Presidential candidates in both parties have accepted illegal contributions. At least she gave it back when she discovered the background of the donors. This is why we need campaign reform like Al Gore tried to get a bill up for. So actually her hand was only in the cookie jar to get the money to return it.
2007-09-12 11:14:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Birds of a feather stick together, Bill sold out the US to the Chinese Hillary is just finishing where Bill left off.
2007-09-13 05:47:48 · answer #2 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there's a skinny line between asking an straightforward question and throwing a delicate "replace-up" to your candidate to "hit out of the park". it incredibly is like a as we communicate guy in a comedy recurring, appearing like it incredibly is a severe question, yet understanding it extremely is is in straightforward terms a set up for the humorous significant other to supply out the "Punch line". Hillary is unlike Tanya Harding. it incredibly is not a straightforward remark! That grew to become into not actual. Tanya's strikes have been criminal!!! yet I admit i don't remember Hillary even having an opinion related to the significant political affairs, not to show show any management skills as 1st lady. Then sometime she unexpectedly desperate to run for president, on the coat tails of her commonplace yet untrue "significant other" bill, who left semen on the gown of "that lady", and tried to lie approximately it, to the courtroom, and the country, collectively as Hillary rooted for a shown liar. in case you pay attention carefully, applicants incredibly do not answer interviewers' questions in many circumstances any way. they are going to easily use the question, to launch right into a "speech" that they have got the desire to make, approximately what they planned to speak approximately besides! If a shill (that's what they're referred to as in teach employer) does not ask a set "up question", she'd ignore related to the actual question, and supply out the set answer any way. So not lots incredibly replaced.
2016-10-10 10:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all when calling someone dumb it would be prudent to spell it correctly.
According to the NYTimes, "Mrs. Clinton told aides this year to vet major donors carefully and help her avoid situations in which she might appear to be trading access for big money, advisers said. Also to be avoided, the senator said, were fund-raising tactics that might conjure up the Clinton White House coffees and the ties to relatively unknown donors offering large sums, like the Asian businessmen who sent checks to the Democratic National Committee."
2007-09-12 05:24:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yep.
She was caught taking things from the White House upon leaving.
And a lot of Americans want her to be president?
2007-09-12 06:38:05 · answer #5 · answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Name me one Politician, on either side of the eisle, past or present who has runa background check on all donations, fundraisers and contributions. It would take months and 10's of thosuand s of dollers per candidate. But when she discovered the questionable funds she immediately donated them to charity and agreed to screen all large donations from now on.
2007-09-12 05:25:57 · answer #6 · answered by Myles D 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Something fishy going on there. Even if she herself didn't steal, she's getting tons of special interest money, and that's what public should be concerned about. When special interests 'donate' big chunks of money, there are always strings attached.
2007-09-12 05:51:38 · answer #7 · answered by Think Richly™ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have to remember this is a woman that claims to be for the people.
Just she has picked the wrong people to be with. She has lied, cheated, stole, murdered and wants to be in office. HAHAHA Fat Chance
2007-09-12 06:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by bulletbob36 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Can you back that accusation up? She happens to have millions of her own thus for she wouldn't need to steal. If you don't like a particular pollination there is a more civilized way to scrutinize them. Lets see the proof.
2007-09-12 05:24:43 · answer #9 · answered by Union_Dooz 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Both the Clinton's have had "VERY" questionable financial dealings ever since they lived in Arkansas, many years ago.
Don't the American people deserve a president that can be trusted???
I'm voting for Ron Paul!
Thank you.
************************************************
2007-09-12 05:41:49 · answer #10 · answered by beesting 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋