I think it's whatever age God has given you the opprtunity to be either one or both....
2007-09-12 05:20:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yvette D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either. That's a 42 year difference. If the grandparent had a child at about 21 and that child had a child at about 21, then yeah. Yeah, 64 is old enough.
2007-09-12 14:42:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lady in Red 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
64 is grandparent age and for those that are parents at that age hope you live to see more of the child.
2007-09-12 16:06:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by kayla 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My mother became a grandparent at 38 (both her and her daughter were married when they got pregnant). When she is 64 her oldest grandson will be 24.
It is no big deal!!
2007-09-12 12:12:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
yes that's old enough to have a 22 year old grandson. My mother will be 62 when my daughter is 22.
2007-09-12 12:16:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Spring 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It could be either. I'm 20 and my grandparents are all in their late 50's- early 60's my parents are in their late 30's- they started young.
2007-09-12 12:55:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no age limit on becoming a grandparent. If you have children when you are young and your children repeat that, then you could be a very young grandparent.
Take care,
Troy
2007-09-12 12:25:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by tiuliucci 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I`m 64 years old, have a 21year old Grand Doughter.
2007-09-12 12:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by skunk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah it is possible the parent would have been 20 when the baby was born and the grand parent would have been 22 when his child was born
2007-09-12 12:27:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by hkmw2005 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
what does age matter?
im 27, my dad is 67,
but then i have a friend who is the same age as me, and her grandfather is only a year older than my dad!
xxx
2007-09-12 12:15:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by sasha 4
·
1⤊
0⤋