Now don't post something like it is impossible for him to win because if you already know who will win then lets call off the elections and save some money since you already know.
Would republicans go out and vote for him or not even bother voting?
2007-09-12 04:59:43 · 15 answers · asked by Edge Caliber 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
My wife & I are both Republicans now, and are voting for Ron Paul and doing all we can to get his message of a Constitutional government across to the local people of our area by handing out flyers and answering countless questions,,,,,,,all without compensation, and proud of it!!!
Thank you.
***************************************************
2007-09-12 05:16:33 · answer #1 · answered by beesting 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yep, i'm vote casting for Ron Paul no rely what the end result's. At this element he's the only candidate who hasn't bought out and who's against the hot international Order & North American Union. regardless of if it capacity that Hillary might win, i might vote for Ron Paul. we don't however be attentive to the end result and the outcomes from a destiny election and the final debate needless to say shows Ron Paul the foremost candidate, even in spite of the incontrovertible fact that the media and Fox omitted the data and the reality as quickly as lower back! whilst he mops the floor with Gulliani interior the subsequent debate the country would be attentive to the reality and he stands out as the subsequent President. howdy Rudy, remember mendacity approximately poisonous ranges on the international commerce centers? properly the hero's and firefighters from that day remember and we will not in any respect ignore! the only actual American's who won't vote for Ron Paul stands out as the wealthy elite who income from the war and having those lobbyist traitors in power and the households and supporters of unlawful immigrants! There are extra center and decrease type annoying working American's than there are unlawful supporters and elite, so Ron Paul has an incredibly reliable possibility to win the election. there is this little checklist that Ron Paul nevertheless believes in and it incredibly is named the form. Ron Paul for President
2016-10-10 10:50:01 · answer #2 · answered by lorts 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly I think so. They are making a big mistake by marginalizing the only antiwar voice in their party. The dems at the last debate were embracing rapid withdrawal. The reality is they flip flop everyone knows it. But Ron Paul is very very consistent and hasnt filp flopped at all. I think people will vote for the dems because they want out of Iraq. Despite knowing they may and likely will change their minds. I think the overriding concern politically in this country right now is getting out. I am talking about the majority of american voters.
I think that the republicans could turn their fortunes around very quickly by embracing Ron Paul. He maintains their social agenda, as well as smaller government, and antisocialist. People could make a huge case for this guy doing what he says and pointing out that Hillary and Obama have gone back and forth on the Iraq issue. I think the majority of americans are isolationists tho they may not recognize it they frequently state I dont want to police the world. And the notion that we send aid all over the world and get no recognition for being nice is common as well.
2007-09-12 05:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't know much about Ron Paul except you see a lot of people for him. I am very conservative and would vote for a dog before I would vote for Hillary. IF Hillary does run on the Democratic ticket, I believe that a lot of Republicans will vote for whoever our candidate is just to make sure Hillary does not win.
2007-09-19 17:51:07 · answer #4 · answered by Eyes Wide Open 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think most would vote for Paul. The sad thing is, he is the one that most accurately espouses the platform of the GOP. The rest of the candidates are a bunch of big government loving socialists.
People should remember that Clinton only had a 2% approval rating (like Paul) at this time in 1991.
Don't count him out yet.
2007-09-12 05:05:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
It would largely depend upon the so-called neoCon faction in the GOP. The neo cons are not conservatives; rather most of them are basically the "boat people" from the old McGovern wing of the democratic party. I think one has to keep in mind that Ron Paul's libertarian background and beliefs also tend to find a home with a number of voters who identify themselves as democrats.
2007-09-17 13:56:50 · answer #6 · answered by Don C 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is one of the dreaded "liberals" that would vote for Ron Paul over Hiiary Clinton !!!!!!!
2007-09-12 05:41:43 · answer #7 · answered by peepers98 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be the only reason and scenario that I would vote for Ron Paul. I will never ever not vote.
2007-09-12 05:07:18 · answer #8 · answered by macaroni 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'd probably vote Libertarian or another 3rd party if those 2 are nominated. Both have too many ideas to which I am opposed.
2007-09-12 06:20:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
his proposals are thought provoking but really radical, regarding the cia,fbi and the other departments he wants to eliminate. none of them would get passed and then what would he have to offer. i vote mostly rep but i still vote for the most qualified and has the best plan, regardless of party affiliation.i do not vote blindly.
2007-09-12 05:17:26 · answer #10 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋