and had to bust his *** 40 hrs a week with real working people like the rest of us?
I'm asking this in response to some aging hippie atheist man glorifying his "imagine" song.
I mean, it's easier to be delusional when your whole life is rock concerts and pot, right?
2007-09-12 04:40:38 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
omg I love these responses, hilarious how I got people all worked up by insulting one of their former liberal hippie overlords
2007-09-12 05:04:12 · update #1
You sure brought out the whining liberals on this question
2007-09-12 04:46:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋
I purely went to work out Rain final nighttime. They did an exceedingly sturdy interest. i think of John Lennon grew to become into particularly proficient and bi-polar. He grew to become into liberal yet truly he would desire to perfect be defined as being anti-conflict. i did no longer unavoidably agree along with his techniques yet that would not eliminate the actuality that he grew to become into an excellent music author. i do no longer understand that i'd call him the Beatles maximum popular chief. i think of that grew to become into Paul McCartney for effective.
2016-11-10 05:44:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Able to get by on his musical abilities"? That's funny!! He was just born playing music, right? he never had to practice, take lessons, or ever work at all, right?
He was a savvy businessman, who read the emotions of the times, figured out how to phrase them, and put them to music that would sell. He sold a hell of a lot of records. Jealous?
By the way, you really do yourself a great disservice if you believe that musical ability is something you're born with. Anybody can learn to play music and it's extremely rewarding, though not always monetarily. All it takes is a little hard work to become proficient, and maybe even make a little on the side. You're not afraid of a little hard work, are you?
2007-09-12 05:21:07 · answer #3 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you don't like rock, you can listen another kind of music. Actually I listen to many kinds of music.
John Lennon and the other Beatles spent hours in a studio. They wrote songs for them and for other artists, too.
You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.
Centrist.
2007-09-12 05:48:45 · answer #4 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Now that the "gimme a toke on that" crowd has thrown rocks at you, Lennon was a musical genius. He was also a hippie at heart, as is his wife.
2007-09-12 05:01:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Same goes for Karl Marx...
While living and writing his political science-fiction fantasies in London, he and his family lived off Engels, who was drawing a steadily increasing income from the family business in Manchester.
It is easy to live in the land-of-make-believe if you do not have to pragmatically deal with reality.
2007-09-12 04:49:46 · answer #6 · answered by floatingbloatedcorpse 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Sure he would have. It's a matter of morals, and he was morally superior to the likes of yourself: superstitious, ignorant and probably Southern.
2007-09-12 10:15:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He would be a commie working on a tug boat fighting for six weeks vacation and a 35 hour work week.
2007-09-12 04:46:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ugh, I despise and loath the "feelings" that are behind the "Imagine" song. It is a load of unmitigated leftist anarchist crap.
2007-09-12 05:00:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
All liberals are rock musicians???
I am SHOCKED to learn that!
2007-09-12 04:54:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋