English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since educators frown on Wikipedia as a source, do you bypass what you think is a good answer if the answerer cited Wikipedia?

2007-09-12 03:31:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

8 answers

An answer that cites only wikipedia will never get my vote. There have been too many errors on that cite to suit me.

I am a college instructor and my students are aware they are not to cite that website.

That being said, it is a useful tool in helping you get some more information, which in turn should help in the research. But since it can't be trusted as a source, it should not be used as a source and therefore, it should not be cited.

2007-09-12 03:40:54 · answer #1 · answered by KDCCPA 5 · 8 0

it could't be a hundred% acurate yet you are able to place self belief in it to a pair extent. it truly is real that all of us can edit and upload to it yet any replace made is introduced. consequently if somebody vandalises the positioning it truly is reverted. suggestion interior the wikipedia got here from greater advantageous than one guy or woman that agree on or with one yet another. consequently an blunders may be actual corrected by ability of every person. it truly is probable being sabotage through fact another encyclopedia Cos are loosing revenues. wikipedia isn't an alternate choice to a suitable encyclopedia yet some entries on it actual got here from an encyclopedia. For me wikipedia is an informative talk board, comparable, yet no longer an encyclopedia. Now with reference to the perfect answer element whilst some err... maximum human beings vote for the perfect answer they do no longer hassle scrolling right down to locate something of the solutions available. they %. the 1st one they see. it truly is why (probable) eighty 5% of the perfect solutions in this internet site is the 1st answer on the checklist.

2016-11-10 05:36:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Nope, not at all. As with any other source, you do have to be careful, do some critical reading of the entries. But by and large, I've found that Wiki seems to be pretty accurate (i.e. it tends to agree with me.)
I doesn't hurt, though, to check out some other, often more "academically acceptable" sources (e.g. encyclopedias, recognized authorities) as well.
By the way, I'm an educator and I rarely frown.

2007-09-12 03:42:52 · answer #3 · answered by johnslat 7 · 4 0

No I'm over protective of my Computer I don't need a issue the I have too pay to be it cleared up. So I don't deal with Wikipedia. My opinion only.

2007-09-12 03:52:04 · answer #4 · answered by Here Kitty Kitty 5 · 1 0

Yes but I assume that the STUDENT who needs the question answered checks out the answer before turning in his/her paper. When I was going through college I had to do all my research, I could ask friends but it was my research with references that I turned in. NO student should use this source as a definitive answer

2007-09-12 04:31:32 · answer #5 · answered by flautumn_redhead 6 · 1 0

You can't really rely on Wikipedia as their information might not be correct; cause their info is provided by people, and they might not be accurate, so no.

2007-09-12 03:40:06 · answer #6 · answered by Lisa 2 · 2 0

Yes, very often, but sure I do not answer to political or religious questions

2007-09-12 04:05:49 · answer #7 · answered by maussy 7 · 0 1

No, in fact, I add a CITATION NEEDED tag to it

2007-09-12 03:39:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers