Are we not drawn onward, we few, drawn onward to new era?
2007-09-12 01:30:48 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
It is the same sentence whether it's read forward or backward.
2007-09-12 01:35:37 · answer #1 · answered by countrygirl30143 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not that it is a palindrome. There are many others.
What I have seen too is that the first word and the last are reciprocal palindromes (to coin a phrase), or mutual palindromes (to coin still another). Still, not even this has to be unique.
Now look again at the sentence: Are we, that is, the three letters making up 'are', we few (only three) not being drawn onward - through the sentence - to a new form, that is a new word, in becoming 'era' ? It is THIS that must be unique about this sentence.!!
2007-09-12 02:28:16 · answer #2 · answered by shades of Bruno 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Runs the same forwards and backwards. A palindrome like 'nurses run' Quite unique.
2007-09-12 03:29:31 · answer #3 · answered by violeo 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
specific our sentences have a brilliant form of innovations on a thank you to BE shaped! each and every thing you assert could be stated yet differently. no longer something could be immediately translated! yet once you recommend syntax then the SVO (subject-verb-merchandise) is extremely diverse from many languages!
2016-10-20 00:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Palindromes aren't unique; people have been playing with them for centuries. One of the most famous is: "Madam, I'm Adam."
2007-09-12 03:12:46 · answer #5 · answered by Elaine P...is for Poetry 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
palindrome
2007-09-12 01:49:00 · answer #6 · answered by Hoolahoop 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dang, she beat me to it. :P
2007-09-12 01:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
one can understand that it is a question..
2007-09-12 01:43:46 · answer #8 · answered by MANISH D 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋