Obama. Voting HIllary is the biggest mistake. You do not need to go far. Their websites tell you a great deal about them. On Obama's site comments, even negative comments are posted almost instantly, on Hillary's it takes a while, minutes, hours, days or may be never to get posted. Her campaign takes the time to screen comments before they get posted. Now, who's shadier. If she can be so shady on petty things like a website then why would her expect her to be nicer on more important issues. She voted for the war and still doing the blame game on that rather than a mea culpa. Obama whilst he was so called 'not-experienced' voiced out against the war while he was serving in IL. And then when you really look at it Hillary's purpoted experience is non-existent. She's only counting on her time as first lady of Arkansas and of the U.S. Who does not know the roles of first ladies? She badly and really badly handled one little task-health care. The only RELEVANT experience she can count on is her time as Senator - but well, she has the blood of thousands of American soldiers on her hands voting for the most unpopular war in recent times. She as well as Obama are junior senators. Obama has been a community organizer. That's how u know leaders. When they organize communities for development purposes. That's how leaders are made. Leaders are not made by being married to a leader. Heck, Laura Bush I believe is now ready and very prepared to be president. Afterall, she's been first lady of both TX and the U.S. Obama has also more legislative experience and has taught Cons. law. What governmental experience does Hillary have other than her current tenure as a junior U.S. senator? She's held ANY government office, for what? 6 years now? Obama has held way more than that amount of time of ANY government office. He's been in the IL legislature for 8 years plus now 3+ years in the U.S. Senate making it 11 years. When Obama states talks about Hillary's experience, Hillary is not getting the actual joke on her. Obama's talking about her experience in the 'ways of Washington' and not about her experience in government or adminstration or anything like that, because it doesn't need to be pointed out that she doesn't have any. By using the phrase with respect to Clinton, Obama's campaign is saying that the ways of Washington has a negative connotation. It means 'not willing to change the usual way business is conducted in Washington'. The usual way that is not working for many
Americans such as those dying in Iraq. Hillary instead kind of thinks Obama is saying that she possesses relevant experience for the job. NO! One can acquire the ways of Washington only by courting White House or Capitol Hills spheres. You really do not need to hold any position to know the ways of Washington. You just need "to be around". I'm sure the longest serving security detail employee in the White House or Congress now knows the 'ways of Washington'. That's even too close- One who's lived in say Bethesda in Maryland since the first Bush I tenure can boost he/she knows the 'ways of Washington'.
Moreover, I thought this is America. The land that 'buys' the greatest people and talents the world over. The place where Einstein called home before his departure. Don't tell me America has become so lacking in potential that they're willing to turn this country into some developing third world political arena, where the same families keep ruling or like this was some monarchy. I thought that's one reason why the first settlers came to this country in the first place from the United KINGDOM. There are other choices other than Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. There's another Bush who's now working his way up the Republican party. Jebb's son. They're already comparing him to a Kennedy.
Wake up people!
2007-09-12 04:42:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by toot 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
AuntCookie84 is living in a dream world. Hillary Clinton does NOT, in any way, shape, or form, have this country's best interests at heart. She is only concerned with one thing -- POWER. Look closely at her rhetoric and you'll see that she offers no real solutions, just like her failed attempt at health care while her husband was in office (how many millions of taxpayer dollars were wasted just to allow her to toot her own horn to no avail?) You say Hillary is really smart and deals well with pressure -- that's not entirely accurate. The truth is she's very sly and and is practiced at the art of shady backroom deals on Capitol Hill. She is a master deceiver. I can chisel it in stone for you that she'd forget every promise she made to the people who voted for her the minute she set foot in the Oval Office. For Hillary, it's all about her own selfish personal ambitions. The only thing she cares about when it comes to the American people is saying whatever she needs to and promising whatever the American people want in order to get elected.
Barack Obama, on the other hand, hasn't been on Capitol Hill very long, so he hasn't had as much exposure to the corruption that runs rampant in Congress. He's not as experienced and I don't agree with all of his political views, but he's definitely the better choice among these two.
2007-09-12 01:25:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
Obama
2016-05-17 21:08:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think both Hillary and Obama are not very good canidates. If I had to choose one I would pick Hilary just because Obama is Muslim. The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US from the inside out when they declaired Jihad on America. Yikes!!
ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office - he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran (Their equivalent to our Bible, but very different beliefs)
2007-09-13 14:53:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by jaems 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Um.. I choose neither. They just give lip service and when they get their votes, they will do whatever they want. Especially Hillary. She's a real slick politician and plays dumb when her campaign contributors are criminals. Too much support from special interest groups makes them puppets for special interest agendas.
I'd say Obama is the lesser of the 2 evils.
2007-09-12 05:06:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Think Richly™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nether they are both so called progressives code for Communist and Obama big ears bin laden is a Muslim. Prof no Muslims saying a word about his so called conversation to a racist church, as to convert from Islam is a death sentence under Islam called a fatwa and none has been said by Muslims.
Biliary is doing the same corrupt money deals with the Chi Com's that they did before. Now she is going to give back $850 K For those of you in Rio Linda that means $850,000. but not giving out the names of these campaign donors like she voted on last week. Rules do not apply to Dem's or the Communist Clinton's.
Vote republican and tune in this week to Glenn Beck on CNN to see what the left is not telling you about planed attacks on our school children and the drive by media is not telling you and putting our children on the line so the left can gain power. SICK!
2007-09-12 03:05:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Please... Hillary? Thinking for herself?... Compared to Obama?
One of the things people criticize Obama for is his independent way of thinking. He thinks outside the box, not along "party lines."
If my only choices were Obama or Hillary, I'd go Obama without a moments hesitation. Hillary couldn't get my vote if she paid me all the money her campaign has raised.
If you want someone other than the President to run the show, then Hillary would probably be the right choice.
2007-09-12 04:34:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by American Girl 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I say anybody BUT Clinton. She is a thief, a cheater, a liar and a murderer. Worst of all she has promised right here in Yahoo to do away with the Bill of Rights. She changes her story as often as she changes audiences. I guess if you are in favor of a socialist country that includes ALL of North America then you would like Rottenham Clinton.
2007-09-12 02:12:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Barack Obama is just as intelligent as Hillary, deals well with pressure and is HONEST. And I'm just curious if AuntCookie84 is aware of the fact that one of our President's sur names was Eisenhower. (After Nazi Germany)
2007-09-12 04:06:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Neither, they both don't know and haven't done anything about this war, immigration will continue for both and both have a foreign policy that will continue to spawn terrorists.
I am not a con, just a realist, only two candidates worth voting are Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich in my honest opinion. Many improtant issues need to be addressed...
2007-09-12 01:07:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Edge Caliber 6
·
2⤊
3⤋