Might want to read this.
http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst090907.htm
And you still want ppl like Hillary and Guiliani?
2007-09-12
00:42:25
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
I'm sure neither of the latter two mentioned truly have "freedom" and "what is best for the common good" in mind.
2007-09-12
00:46:24 ·
update #1
I was being a smarta55 Open Your Eyes. jeez.;)
2007-09-12
00:54:34 ·
update #2
Does this question mention anything at all about racism? No. However if you wish, i will ask about racism as it pertains to "ALL" of the current candidates running. But what will that solve?
2007-09-12
01:08:36 ·
update #3
I think Kucinich shot himself in the foot. He supports the UN. Bad idea.
2007-09-12
01:10:57 ·
update #4
Ron Paul isn't an isolationist. A policy of non-intervention serves well in the global society we live today and will deter many presidents to go to war with unjust cause. This doesn't mean we'll cut ourselves from the world or we won't defend ourselves. We will attack when we have justification for it and we will always be on the defense. Non-interventionism is coherent policy that will actually make the U.S. more prosperous and will stop us from pursuing futile endeavors.
2007-09-12 03:00:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by cynical 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
listed under are my reasons: a million. he's common 2. He speaks his ideas 3. He walks his talk 4. He has integrity 5. he's additionally depended on 6. He defends the form 7. He defends our liberties 8. He defends our privateness 9. He defends our assets 10. He is time-honored with economics and economic coverage 11. He is time-honored with the distant places coverage of the founders 12. He has in no way voted to lift taxes 13. He voted against the Iraq conflict 14. he's going to grant the troops homestead 15. he will look after the veterans sixteen. he will return the country the way founders had expected 17. he's going to make the U. S. healthful as quickly as greater, in words of the economic device and funds 18. he will make individuals greater in cost for their lives whether of taking hand-outs from the government and being based on the government.
2016-11-15 00:38:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thank you for the link.
It's very obvious to see from the link, Ron Paul wants Americans to drive American trucks on American highways.......And receive the "Pay" for it.
He doesn't want any more American jobs or industry to be lost, since the more money {wealth} that stays in America, the wealthier the whole country becomes.
If American created wealth is lost, all America becomes poorer. It's simple "Economics"!
If the Trillion American dollars sloshing around in China had never left American shores......America would be a Trillion dollars richer....
Please think about this!
Thank you.
************************************************
2007-09-12 06:04:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by beesting 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
So far Ron Paul is the one I will vote for. He does seem to be more isolationist than most but after our imperial days maybe that is a good thing.
Towelie> Had a chance to get your Civil War facts straight yet?
2007-09-12 02:31:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Liberal socialists and conservative socialists try to smear Ron Paul by calling him "isolationist", "pro-drug addiction", a freak, etc.
It is truly shameful that a person like Ron Paul is treated like a heretic when he is the only candidate that stands for the things that make America great: personal freedom and capitalism.
2007-09-12 01:03:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by freedom_vs_slavery 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul is the only honest candidate running. He tells the truth and doesn't lie.
So what's the problem??
People don't take him seriously because he is a Libertarian at heart, not a Republican.
And since we have de-evolved to a two party system it may take some more time before lazy Americans decide to embrace something new.
2007-09-12 00:53:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Towelie 4
·
6⤊
3⤋
I do not think I want either of those two you mention. They are a couple of sell outs. Ron Paul is at least listening to the American people. 80% of those polled want those damn borders secured and the ILLEGALS the hell out of here. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?
2007-09-12 03:17:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by bootsontheroad 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ron Paul is THE MAN.
Too bad that the Pubs have hopelessly marred thier image with the American public. I'm sure many people aren't even listening to Ron Paul's message. I hate politicians, but this guy is an exception. Every thing that he says makes sense. I may not agree with EVERY policy...but I respect his ideas, because he truly has the greater good in mind.
2007-09-12 00:50:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
3⤋
Ron Paul is an idiot.
Maybe you should read this Ron Paul gem penned after the LA riots:
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/g/ftp.py?people/g/gannon.dan/1992/gannon.0793
Indeed, it is shocking to consider the uniformity of opinion among
blacks in this country. Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5%
of blacks have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market,
individual liberty, and the end of welfare and affirmative action. I know
many who fall into this group personally and they deserve credit--not as
representatives of a racial group, but as decent people. They are,
however, outnumbered. Of black males in Washington, D.C, between the ages
of 18 and 35, 42% are charged with a crime or are serving a sentence,
reports the National Center on Institutions and Alternatives. The Center
also reports that 70% of all black men in Washington are arrested before
they reach the age of 35, and 85% are arrested at some point in their
lives. Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the "criminal
justice system," I think we can safely assume that 95% of the black males
in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal.
2007-09-12 00:59:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
6⤋
So this has what to do with Ron Paul? He's against NAFTA.
2007-09-12 02:17:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Big Bear 7
·
3⤊
0⤋