English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is this just to avoid a backlash and who is sickened that they even considered it in the first place

2007-09-12 00:37:08 · 30 answers · asked by Katie 2 in News & Events Current Events

i am, whether they are innocent or guilty i think its wrong they even thought about using the money that was intended to find maddie

2007-09-12 00:37:57 · update #1

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91210-1283762,00.html

2007-09-12 00:39:25 · update #2

whats your problem dazey? or should that be dozey?

2007-09-12 00:40:52 · update #3

Esther McVey, a director of the fund said they were thinking about using it, not me

2007-09-12 00:42:04 · update #4

Mormex (or moron or whatever you're called) my first question was about the possibility of getting the fund frozen and is not mentioned in this question. they are completely different.

2007-09-12 00:45:23 · update #5

im saying i cant believe they contemplated using it in the first place, it was for maddie not to pay for expensive lawyers for the parents

2007-09-12 00:46:12 · update #6

30 answers

Who said they considered it? You! The Newspapers! FGS will you stop turning assumptions, guesses and news paper reports into fact!

2007-09-12 00:40:48 · answer #1 · answered by flyingconfused 5 · 3 9

I agree " michael w "... The McCanns did no longer forget their young ones and did no longer take one hour to call the Police. i'm beginning to have faith which you already know greater appropriate to the case than the PJ, LOL. Your help of the McCanns is somewhat too irrational which you would be completely harmless. it fairly is obviously rubbish yet you're complicated somewhat some human beings including your irrational loyalty for those 2. it extremely is impossible which you would be that dependable interior the mild of each thing we've discovered appropriate to the McCanns and the case.... except for sure you're freemason your self. Now... this could be a theory, michael !!! What inn, michael ? you in addition to mght 'forgot', michael, that as quickly as the Portuguese Detectives visited Britain and interviewed the acquaintances, the two McCanns fled to Brussells, michael !!!

2016-10-04 10:38:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Bravo Lozzo! Finally someone on here talks sense.

The McCanns never said they were going to use these funds in the first place. The Trustees have looked into it, but never once did the McCanns claim they wanted to use it. The Daily Star quotes from Gerry are made up nonsense to fuel the fire.

I have been trying to argue this all along, but all anyone wants to say is "how could they?" and "the fund should be frozen" etc, without actually looking at the facts. People will believe whatever they are told without questioning it.

This is scary stuff. Do your research, people!

2007-09-12 01:02:24 · answer #3 · answered by helly 6 · 1 2

I thought the funds were for the entire find maddie campaign, not just the physically find maddie part.
I'm on 2 minds, they are not poor people and any money left after (PRAY TO GOD) maddie comes home could go to help other families, but on the other hand that is what the money was donated for.
As for maddie, people are too quick to say she is dead, remember last year some time, i think it was a belgian girl found after 8/10 years alive.

2007-09-12 00:42:33 · answer #4 · answered by Humza 5 · 2 1

Read the report again. It was the trustees of the fund, NOT the McCanns, who questioned the legality of using the fund for legal fees. Reading between the lines, it seems as if the McCanns themselves have refused to consider using the fund.
.

2007-09-12 00:47:16 · answer #5 · answered by Lozzo 3 · 3 0

The McCanns considered using this fund because they are scared out of their wits at what might happen to them.Thank god the directors came to this decision. If the Mc's are as innocent as they say they are they shouldn't need the backing of a million pound fund. They just need to tell the truth and answer ALL the questions ....simple.

2007-09-12 00:48:16 · answer #6 · answered by little weed 6 · 3 2

Yeah and note this extract especially the last sentence:-

It is understood the Missing Madeleine campaign meeting is going ahead despite the couple's statement.

The fund's website says one of the objectives of the fund is to "provide support, including financial assistance, to Madeleine's family."

Esther McVey, a director of the Madeleine Fund, said she and the other five directors are meeting at 2pm this afternoon.

"What we are discussing is what does 'support' mean," she explained. "This is the only thing on the agenda and this is a special meeting."

HOW ABOUT CONSIDERING THE OTHER OBJECTIVES OF THE FUND - RELEASING FUNDS TO FIND MADDY AND TO BRING HER ABDUCTORS/KILLERS TO JUSTICE. ......

2007-09-12 00:42:57 · answer #7 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 5 1

They will use the fund money to pay for the services of Phil and Justine etc.

Who out their own gnerosity will pay for the lawyers required

2007-09-12 00:45:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They are only doing what people want them to do... People are disgusted they are using the fund for lawyers fees next again day they announce they are not going to do it anymore. People are commenting on how there is no emotion shown and next thing Gerry is crying at the airport!! If they didn't do it they are up to something!!!

2007-09-12 00:42:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

and guess who was thinking they would use the fund for legal fees! Can we now see some people back on here apologising or is that too much?

2007-09-12 01:57:51 · answer #10 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0 0

That fund should now be frozen,
What about all the interest it is making, it must be well over a million now?
How dare they use that money, it's to find Madeleine, it not there's to take, it's Madeleine's

2007-09-12 00:39:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers