should sen. clinton be president?

Question

she looks like she really knows what she's talking about

Answer 1

Godfather I know you idolize thieves, crooks, liars, cheaters and murderers but most of us do not want those qualities in our leaders. Clinton has every one of those qualities.

Answer 2

Although I still support Edwards, one thing I will say is this, she has been running a very good campaign. I was a skeptic of Hillary, I thought Hillary was "unelectable" but watching her campaign has made me change my views in that regard. She has done really well in the debates. But I still don't necessarily support her just because she is always thinking of what the best answer is politically, she doesn't always go with her conscience, similar to Romney, Giuliani and Obama. I want a candidate that is honest about his or her views, such as Edwards, Ron Paul, Mike Gravel and even the extreme right wing republicans like Duncan Hunter and Tancredo. At least those candidates are honest about where they stand.

Answer 3

She's definitely intelligent and resourceful. And she has a mind given to strategic positioning.

Given these facts, I say she would make a very good president.

But the problem is here is that she also comes across as scheming and cunning. I certainly want a president who can be scheming and cunning when dealing with other countries (especially our enemies), but it could backfire if she does it with us (the public of America).

I believe very much that she can handle the job (better than our current president for sure and more than likely any candidate out there on either side of the aisle), but I'm not sure that I trust her to not do it to us. She seems capable of lying to us to get done things she wants done. I've seen enough of that over the last seven years to know I don't want anymore of it.

I'm far more trusting of Barack Obama or Rudy Guliani. I'm not sure either is as capable of dealing with other countries as Hilary Clinton, but I believe both are more trustable than she is when dealing with the American public.

If she were to win, I would like it I think. But I would never take her at face value. Basically I would see it as at least 4 more years (maybe even 8 more years) of what we currently have in Bush (though from the other side of the aisle). Since I am on her side of the aisle I would prefer it to what is currently in office, but I would always be at least slightly untrusting of her adminstration.

Answer 4

Does "IS" mean I did not have sexual relations with that girl?

Not no, but He__ No. I am not happy that as a Registered Republican who voted for dumb *** George DUBYA, twice, that our country is in such sad shape that the general poplulation will undoubetly believe that means a change from party to party is necessary. Too bad the American people won't take the time to learn what each PARTY is for and against and what each CANDIDATE supports and does not support. I do nt believe a democtatic reign in the white house and congress is the answer, I believe in the traditional reublican value and ideas. It sucks that one man gave the party such a disgraceful name. I am from New Orleans and I am in the minorty party, but after katrina I can't even look at that man smirk.

Having said that...the only thing worse than having Dubya as President is having Hilary serve a third and fourth term (didnt'she already serve two terms when hubbie defeated Bush Sr. and after)

This woman will stop at nothing to get what she wants, she will lie and cheat (and burry her head in the sand to avoid witnessing spouse cheat) to have her way. She is dishonest, she tells the people ehst they want to hear. Case in point, she backed the attack on Iraq 100%, she is on tape and now she backpeddles faster that Bill can unzip his pants.

Why did she move to new yourk to run for Senate rather than back to her home state, SHE KNEW SHE COULD NO LONGER FOOL HER HOME STATE.

I do hope for a female president in the very near future but God Help us if its Hilary

Answer 5

You must be joking. If we elect her, she'll find America's #1 enemy and sell the country to them. Besides, wasn't she co-president long enough when Clinton was in the White House?

Answer 6

She is a very smart woman but I do worry about her connections.
I'm still holding onto Dennis Kucinich. I know it's a long shot but I really believe he would be the best person for President for the people.

Answer 7

Given the state of our country during Clinton and the state of our country under Bush I would easily take Clinton.

Answer 8

No, and I am voting for Obama, and not because he is raising the most money, because he isn't fudging his books, and others are actually contributing to see him elected because his message is clear.

Front runners (a dumb term in all elections for whom the three top candidates are - or, those that are raising the most money and likely to win):

(This is as 6/30/07, and does not include the money from "loans" from candidates or from "authorized committees" which is one of the same.)

Obama-58,610,749.62

Clinton-.53,072,594.44
(she added $10 Million to make it look like she was leading in raising money, this is the accurate amount she raised, and who knows if she hasn't added money in other names to get this figure, I would not put it past her)

Romney-35,044,174.46
Giuliani-33,547,792.28
McCain-24,945,777.58
Edwards-23,059,412.47
Richardson-13,264,264.05
Dodd-7,298,487.88
Biden-.4,467,403.49
Paul-3,006,891.61
Tancredo-2,755,709.81
Brownback-2,736,107.96
Huckabee-1,308,497.78
Hunter-1,310,281.76
Kucinich-1,116,714.71
Thompson-788,611.04
Gilmore-356,886.16
Gravel-175,229.58

Answer 9

Yes she should. I think she looks like and sounds like a Modern Day Margaret Thatcher !

Answer 10

Look in to Ron Paul and Dennis Kunnich.

Have Fun!