okay i want to know if you people know that the two towers and building 7 were rigged with explosives in order to collapse. i dont want people who are naive to keep writing how im wrong and how it was just the terrorist when i know the facts they wont put on the news. only put an answer to weather you did or didnt know if the wtc and building 7 were purposely collapse because of explosives and not the plane.
2007-09-11 18:08:58 · 6 answers · asked by subs r de best 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Ummm yea.....you believe what ever you want...I'm sick of the people who disgrace those that were killed by terrorists for political reasons.
2007-09-11 19:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why is it that people can't comprehend that the buildings fell due to the damages inflicted by the planes and the subsequent fires?
It makes sense to me that the floors were damaged, causing them to weaken, therefore causing them to collapse.
Once they started to fall, the weight and fire took down the rest of the buildings.
2007-09-12 06:50:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its doubtful if the real facts will ever be known but I do find it curious that they managed to rig WTC 7 with explosives in such a short time after it was deemed to be structurally unsound.
2007-09-12 01:17:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mimik 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's clear to me that all three buildings were planned demolitions. Physics Professor Steven Jones has clearly details evidence to support this in his papers.
Several of us wrote simulation programs of the collapse based on inertia of the building, and the pancake theory is several times slower than free fall speed. When you consider the energy required to pulverize concrete and contents of the buildings, it would have been even slower than that.
It's painfully obvious based that the building collapse was not the consequence of fuel laden airplanes crashing into the towers. We need an accurate investigation into the events of 9/11/2001. We also need those who were incompetent or complicit to be held accountable for the actions.
2007-09-12 01:26:28 · answer #4 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Your nickname handle doesn't lend much merit to what you're saying. And you really don't go into detail with your evidence. Let's be fair a sec, OK?
Why not post your website, featuring what you know and hard core proof to back what you allege up......THEN we'll see if you're right---or another mental midget.
2007-09-12 01:35:30 · answer #5 · answered by Hard Rocker 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can show you facts.... You Tube.com/911 loose change.. Listen to the facts!
2007-09-12 01:52:08 · answer #6 · answered by Thunderrolls 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋