behind a one bedroom hut in the ghettoo's of an unchartered hawaiin island within a week, but our entire government and the cooperating governments of the free world can't find bin laden, the leader of a global terrorist network who has to keep in contact with and direct and be hidden by them. has anyone thought that maybe the best place to hide is where no one will look, like maybe bin laden is presently driving a cab in NYC and was there watching the towers collapse when it happened????
2007-09-11 15:29:17 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
lets get DOG and his well blessed beautiful wife to find bin laden and get this over with!
2007-09-11 15:36:14 · update #1
This might be a good comparison.Dog is not bound by certain laws.Bounty hunters don't need search warrants,they can just go and get them.So I don't know why our government acts like we need a search warrant to go into Pakistan.International law or the Geneva Convention did not protect us on 9/11.Why should we let it protect Bin Ladin?
2007-09-11 15:45:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
EXELLENT POINT!! I've always thought that Bush really didn't want bin Laden. He certianly doesn't seem to care, and he's been quoted as saying 'Bin Laden is no longer a priority.' Everything Bush did after 9-11 pointed at Iraq, as if the two were connected....
2007-09-11 15:35:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Dog is a perfect example of how a private enterprise can do the law enforcement job better than a government agency. Dog has to make money, so he has to catch the bad guy. If a government agent catches a bad guy, he's just working his way out of a job.
2007-09-11 15:37:53 · answer #3 · answered by smartsassysabrina 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
thing is the crack addict has no one helping him stay hidden.
2007-09-11 15:58:49 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMAO this question was a blast..!!
2007-09-11 16:03:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋