yes its her, it looks like a picture her little boyfriend would take of her. She isnt a little kid....but I think its all a publicity stunt to get her some attention...its sad that this is what it takes to make it in hollywood...
2007-09-11 15:33:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by CoutureCutie 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sometimes people did something stupid in their past specially when they're young and not yet aware of the viciousness of the real world.
Some famous and powerful men and women also did something a bit beyond when the where young if you saw Pirates of Silicon Valley Microsoft Founders and Apple Founders did something in their youth - like Bill Gates I think tried driving a truck or bulldozer, Steve Jobs I think was an student activist in college.
Its when people become famous or someone wants to take them down that things they did may come back to haunt them. Maybe there's even a unknown beautiful teen age person taking some personal photo somewhere that only few know.
What I always wonder is why do we only judge and condemn those who have been in the news that is doing something different from the norms. Has anyone ever condemn those out of the spot light - the one responsible for digging that trash up, the one who voluntarily gave those picture, the one who circulated them.
The one who dug up those personal mistakes aren't exactly a holy, divine person. If you going to look one should feel threatened cause everytime someone's personal issues, mistakes from the past are dug up it only means our right to privacy is easily violated. And Every time someone voluntarily gives up a secret about another person, one should feel threatened cause we can't rest in assurance that we can trust anyone. Why are they not judged, and condemned they committed also an act not only outside the norms of society, but outside the law and rights of the people.
What if this person - i.e. if Vanessa Hudgens did really pose nude, but because push or influenced or set up by someone? Who condemns those influences. They just did a terrific job of ruining or corrupting someone and escape the judgement and may do it again.
2007-09-11 16:01:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by eternalvoid 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
All I can say is what a dumb c***. (I think that's the first time I ever used that word in my life- that's how mad I am). I was so excited about HSM because I was like "Finally! Some decent role models for a change!" But then that dumb b*tch had to go and disappoint me and millions of fans. I'm not saying posing nude per se is morally offensive (given that it's JUST nudity and nothing else) but Vanessa doing it? That's just creepy, and I think it's vulgar to just casually take a nude picture of yourself and send it on your phone to someone you're not close to, especially at that age. I mean, she was like 16 when she took those pictures and even now she looks and has the emotional maturity of a little girl. On the plus side, I was never a fan of hers to begin with- I like HSM for Ashley and Monique!
But then, most child stars have always been messed up, everyone from Judy Garland to Lindsay Lohan, so why am I surprised?
2007-09-11 18:02:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is her. But I don't think anybody else has posed nude for their boyfriend. Nude just because Pete Wentz, he had some pictures in his phone too that were made public. A lot more of celebrities have made porn tapes for somebody else like Paris (she has done 2) Britney Spears, Colin Farrell, Ashanti, Jennifer Lopez..etc..
2007-09-11 15:56:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it's really her, she admitted this to the media.
Who knows how many other kid celebrities have done this? If the picture hadn't gotten out, her reputation would still be sparkling clean. Unfortunately, it did get out, and now she's going to have pinned to her identity forever.
2007-09-11 15:30:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mandy 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think it's true. She probably leaked the photos since sex scandals have worked for Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian since they have no known talent. She should have known better since she's been on the squeaky clean Disney channel.
2007-09-11 15:52:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by cats 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes she did I saw it. She looked very immature. Supposedly she didn't think it would ever get released, very sad. If it matters, she looks better with her clothes on. I think Hollywood and parents of starlets are doing them real harm when you lo0ok at how Britney and Lindsey have turned out.
2007-09-11 15:35:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I feel bad for her. She was lost and confused and just did what she felt like. Thank Goodness she apologized though! I think she is a cool girl, just has to keep her thoughts straight.
2007-09-12 08:22:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sha_La_La 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think of so, yet this photograph controversy can positioned a damp on her profession. we are speaking approximately Disney right here. if she grew to become into working for HBO then it probable would have been ok. yet a minimum of she apologized.
2016-11-10 04:40:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard she did it when she was 15 and she meant to give the pic to some other kid celebrity on disney.
2007-09-11 15:33:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋