Yes. Why do Democrats vote in such anti-American traitors?
2007-09-11 15:22:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by D.A. S 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
That is pretty much what a lot of people are saying. The progress in Anbar has been organic - growing on it's own, not as a result of US force.
What's reprehensible about that? Finally, some Iraqis are standing up so we can stand down. Isn't that what we've been saying we want to happen?
2007-09-11 22:22:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
He's right!!!
The success in Anbar was happened because the sectarian factions united to fight al Qaeda. This sort of cooperation can is what will bring success in Iraq. There is nothing our troops can do to bring peace to Iraq. The problem needs a political solution, not a military one.
2007-09-11 22:24:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
When Chuck Schumer was first running for office, I was putting two kids through college.
He ran on a ticket that included education reform and low cost loan assistance for New York State students.
I voted for him.
Both my kids have graduated.
I'm still waiting for Schumer to deliver on his promise.
"Sen. Chuck Schumer and New York teacher union leaders cover up that we need reform by only talking about money. Show us the results with the money you've already spent. It's results that matter, not expenditures."
-- Rod Paige, U.S. Secretary of Education
voted no: Reduce college textbook costs via federal rules & deductions.
voted no: School vouchers
voted no: Educational Savings Accounts
voted no: Extending tax credits beyond interest expense to include a percentage of tuition.
voted no: Federal or state aid to schools that allow voluntary prayer.
Did not participate in any other votes concerning tax or tuition reliefs for parents paying for University or graduate school.
Teacher Testing: Current law is that states certify teachers and decide what their requirements are; there are currently no national standards nor testing. Schumer and most liberals favor raising teacher pay and oppose teacher testing on the grounds of treating teachers more ‘professionally’.
Class Size: Many liberals advocate for smaller class sizes, and/or building more schools to achieve them. Generally, any reference to ‘smaller classrooms,’ or especially to ‘building public schools’, implies opposition to funding private schools. Schumer's voting record bears that out.
The man is a sot.
2007-09-11 22:43:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No. If the surge was working, Petraeus would have said, "Yes, America is safer than it was". He refused to say that, though because the surge is not working, and he knows it. He has a job to protect...he knows what happens to people who disobey Bush's orders! He is a spokesman for Bush and he knows exactly what to say to appease Bush.
2007-09-11 22:28:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by ArRo 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Goodness, what a reprehensible act by stating the truth.
Next thing ya know, some President will dictate policy by belief in bible verses.
2007-09-11 22:42:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by navymom 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes along with the other appeasers on the left
2007-09-11 22:48:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Most reprehensible? I remember a man by the name of Craig over the last couple of weeks...
...and what he said is true. If it weren't, then ALL 19 benchmarks would have been made, not less than half.
2007-09-11 22:25:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
No Larry Craig is.
Schumer's right. The Iraqis want us to leave, the soldiers and their families want to leave, everyone wants US soldiers out of Iraq except the chimpies. We're causing more problems than we're solving over there and the surge never accomplished squat.
Get over it.
2007-09-11 22:21:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by spongeworthy_us 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
Yes he is. Reid, Pelousi and the whole bunch are nothing but traitors.
2007-09-11 22:45:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋