One cannot find what one does not look for, and one does not look for that which he already knows the location of.
2007-09-18 09:14:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Penny K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can anyone blame Bill Clinton? I was GW Bush who invaded Afghanistan - why did he quit before completing his mission to capture Bin Laden.
Bush, for all practical purposes, is impotent right now. Many in his circle of advisors have resigned. As one YA poster said recently, Mr. Bush recently appears anxious and more easily irritated before the public. His ratings have dropped down to a low 30s. No other president had that it that low.
2007-09-19 08:04:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It's not only Bin Laden, it's the rest of his group (Al-Qaeda) that people should be thinking about. I can't believe some of these answers! How far can you stick your head in the sand, to think that Bin Laden, et al, acts all by himself and there are no others working in the wings? Or even that Al-Qaeda wasn't implicit in 9/11? Al-Qaeda is very happy with the war in Iraq, because it takes our resources and attention away from what they are planning.
2007-09-11 14:26:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Petrushka's Ghost 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bin Laden is a multi millioner, he can buy anything he wants, including his freedom. He has brainwashed his fanatic supporters and made these supporters believe that dying for his cause is dying for God. Bin Laden has worldwide networks that support his activities. Maybe he change his face every now and then to elude whoever is interested to capture him.
2007-09-11 14:23:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by gerry 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all you can't blame Bush. Clinton had him but decided to release him when Sudan was going to turn him over to us.
As far as why he is still free? Think of the greatest leader you can think of. Now imagine that you are part of that leasers army, and the invading army is asking you where he is. Are you going to tell them? These Muslim radicals are very loyal and would rather die before ratting Bin Laden out.
Also consider all of the budget cuts during the Clinton administration meant that a lot of over seas work was stopped. After 9/11 we had to start all over.
2007-09-19 10:02:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Osama Bin weighted down is lifeless, and has been lifeless for 8 years. He grew to become into dying of kidney failure whilst the twin Towers grew to become into blamed on him. Does no person be conscious that all the movies of him are previous? This modern "message" blanketed in straightforward terms an previous image of him and a valid music. and then there grew to become into that well known movie clip purportedly exhibiting him at a social gathering, however the guy we've been to have faith grew to become into him grew to become into built thoroughly diverse, or, as people who had met him stated, "the guy we observed there grew to become right into a undergo. Osama is a giraffe." the persons who want you to have faith he nevertheless lives would produce different reasons which at the instant are not as we communicate obvious.
2016-10-10 10:10:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, sort of. He's basically confined to a certain area in Pakistan and is pretty ineffective in planning big events like 9/11. Maybe that's no so bad. Look at it this way, he's got a better chance of contracting an infectious decease that will give him a slow and painful death.
2007-09-11 14:08:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I'll ask you, "Why does the FBI have a 10 most wanted list"? The answer is, If a person is not a total moron, has money and people willing to help them it's not that hard to hide.
By the way, I'm not happy about not having his head on a pike, I'm just not consumed by it.
In Frith,
Spence
"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc"
M. Addams
2007-09-11 14:21:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by marac9000 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush cares less about Bin Laden, all he wants is oil from Iraq. I heard a video of bush saying that Bin Laden is not his priority.
2007-09-11 17:06:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Andrea 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
-The latest bin laden video is a forgery. Less than 4 minutes of the 26 minute long video are animated footage. The rest is still frame shots. The mention of current events in the audio track occurs only during the still frame segments. The rest of the video is edited together from previous recordings. Bin Laden is most probably already dead.
Bin Laden had NOTHING to do with 9/11. The US government is the real 'terrorist'.
Theories are unproven. I'm a conspiracy truthist.
May God bless those that truly serve him.
2007-09-11 14:09:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by ohm 6
·
1⤊
6⤋
How can anyone blame Clinton when he wasn't even President when 9/11 happened, it happened on Bush's watch and the responsibility was his to get Bin Laden period!!.........
2007-09-11 14:14:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋