These are the people that bombed our country 6 years ago! Don't you get angry when they send their videos to us to make us look foolish? The Presidents of yore would not have taken that, much less for 6 years. Why doesn't Bush get angry at least? Do you know?
2007-09-11
13:15:13
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Petrushka's Ghost
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Strange, now I'm using a "commie trick?" Doesn't my question sound a lot like "Libs and Dems, why don't you support our troops?"
2007-09-11
13:29:11 ·
update #1
The inattention to Al-Qaeda by so many will be our downfall. OBL may be a sick little man hanging out in the desert, but don't think there's not others with more plans to attack our country.
2007-09-11
13:41:03 ·
update #2
I don't think its right to play their game like that...
Neither the Repubs or Democrats support Al-Qaeda... please don't play this game... it makes us all look foolish in the end.
2007-09-11 13:31:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by rabble rouser 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oh look a mudslinging lying liberal,
What the hell have you ever done for your country?
Conservatives are an overwhelming majority of the military.
You are supporting Al Queada,,, by not joining and helping kill them.
Your question is nothing like that. Why? Because conservatives Do not support Al Queda directly ever.
Liberals on the other hand do say they support the troops but the liberal leaders undermine the troops very often and when there is a bad troop liberals stand in line to show people how bad the military is.
2007-09-11 13:22:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by WCSteel 5
·
8⤊
2⤋
I don't. But why do you?
You bought an ad in yesterday's NYT blasting our general for killing your fellow "freedom fighters."
Read up on your history. We were attacked five times by al Qaeda during the Clinton administration, and it was not until we got a new president did we send troops to Afghanistan to eliminate al Qaeda.
I am sure your leader and presidential candidate Barack Saddam Hussein Obama bin Laden would be proud of this post. Be sure to remove the boulder from the mouth of your cave and get a little sunlight each day.
2007-09-11 13:21:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
LOL! you've got it backwards! It's the liberals who support OBL. (Clinton did nothing to retaliate against Bin Laden when he struck at the U.S.S. Cole. HINT, HINT!)
Besides, they're the ones who would want to give him a trial if he were captured.
And the ironic thing is that, OBL would still hate the liberals and want to convert them to Islam.
2007-09-12 13:52:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's like this.Neocons get into the white house with an agenda to attack Iraq
http://zfacts.com/p/775.html
The threat of Alquaida and OBL is ignored until he attacks on 9/11.After that the Neocons did everything in their power to convince Bush to attack Iraq even before Afghanistan
By the afternoon on Wednesday [after Sept. 11], Secretary Rumsfeld was talking about broadening the objectives of our response and "getting Iraq." Secretary Powell pushed back, urging a focus on al Qaeda. Relieved to have some support, I thanked Colin Powell. "I thought I was missing something here," I vented. "Having been attacked by al Qaeda, for us now to go bombing Iraq in response would be like our invading Mexico after the Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor."
Powell shook his head. "It's not over yet." Indeed, it was not. Later in the day, Secy. Rumsfeld complained that there were no decent targets for bombing in Afghanistan and that we should consider bombing Iraq, which, he said, had better targets. At first I thought Rumsfeld was joking. But he was serious and the President did not reject out of hand the idea of attacking Iraq. Instead, he noted that what we needed to do with Iraq was to change the government, not just hit it with more cruise missiles, as Rumsfeld had implied.
Source: Against All Enemies, by Richard Clarke, chapter 1
http://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/Against_All_Enemies_War_+_Peace.htm
Bush attacked Afghanistan anyway,he couldn't really do anything else with the eyes of the world on him but forces inside the administration were and are still focused on their PNAC agenda and in that agenda OBL isn't important.It's about states,think Iran.It also benefits them having him out there to keep people afraid and more willing to go along with war retoric.
2007-09-11 13:26:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
The way I see it is this way... Osama is a sickly looking, washed out old goat living in a cave. All he's been able to do thus far is send a series of stupid videos. In my opinion, it shows how desperate Al-Qaeda really is, how pissed off they are that we're killing and busting their butts all over the place. God bless America, her troops and their Commander In Chief!!!
2007-09-11 13:21:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by bonsai_kitty66 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
Yes, you are pulling an old commie trick.
Cool!!!!
Democrats Support Terrorists.
Terrorists Support Democrats.
Both Democrats & Terrorists are working together to Defeat the USA.
Cool!!!!
(Nice try. The commies used to pull that trick off. But it's old stuff anymore.
Going to "star" you for effort.)
2007-09-11 13:23:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by wolf 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
Sorry, but the one looking silly is bin Laden in that ridiculous video. Hey Tarbash, pass me the Grecian Formula so I can darken my beard and look sessy for the muslim virgins. Hey, don't hog (huh-huh, I made a funny, my friend) the chips and tabbouleh dip.
2007-09-11 13:24:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Nice try to project your party of Communist and Muslim terrorist as Osama bin laden and Castro and Hugo and the others who wish to take down the USA support you.
You own defeat and when we are attacked again there will be no place for you to hide not even France will have you.
2007-09-11 13:22:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
I think this is a more apt question for defeatist, appeasing, America-hating liberal democrats. Conservatives and Republicans are trying to do everything they can to go after Al Qaeda and Islamic terrorists, but the libs impede our every move.
2007-09-11 13:20:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋