English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ABC News says very wealthy saudi nationals are funding osama and al queida. GWB is going to send $20 billion worth of weapons to the saudis. Who is funding OBL? Who wanted to sell ports to dubai? See the connection? GWB needs to be stopped. Those weapons do not need to be sent to the saudis.

2007-09-11 13:06:40 · 16 answers · asked by MyMysteryId 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

I knew right from the moment that I saw Fahrenheit 911 that Bush was really behind this all along.

2007-09-11 13:12:04 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 6 · 3 2

It's more complicated than that, although correct.

The Saud royal family stays in power by keeping on the good side of the Wahhabi fundamentalist clerics that brought them to power - the same ones who spread money into madrases schools and terrorists. The Sauds also use the money they get from selling oil to the West to stay in power.

Osama bin Laden first terrorist act was to try to overthrow the Sauds and bring an Islamic caliphate to rule over the holy sites of Saudi Arabia. He was caught, jailed and exiled, winding up in Afghanistan with a grudge against the US for our military base in SA and our monetary support of the Sauds.

Should the Saud Royals be overthrown , the country would make Iran back in the ayatollah days look like our best ally.

This is one applecart we should not upset. Bush had the ignorance to try to 'right' Iraq - isn't that enough?

2007-09-11 14:36:07 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0 0

No, in no way. that's greater probable the Republican celebration is funded via terrorists, because of the fact they're doing the paintings of the terrorists via attempting to make us all worry and hate. via the way, i think you probably did no longer comprehend or forgot to point that the ACLU filed an amicus short in prefer of Rush Limbaugh whilst his prescription information have been offered to the FBI whilst he grow to be under study for drug trafficking. Are you asserting Rush is supported via a 17 November? Oh, and opposite to HB, the ACLU is totally privately funded, there is not any public investment of the ACLU.

2016-11-14 23:54:07 · answer #3 · answered by bojan 4 · 0 0

Osama Bin Laden is a millionaire. His family is worth billions. Other Saudis are very wealthy and where do you think their money comes from? Oil, the oil you buy at the pump because we have not spent money or resources on alternative sources of energy.

2007-09-11 13:27:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Indirectly every country in the world is funding them through gasoline.

Most of Americas gasoline comes from Canada and Mexico though.

Iran, Saudi Arabia and to some extent Venezuela are funding them for the most part.

A considerable portion of them are training in Pakistan and African countries. Darfur is a Muslim extremist organization killing other Muslims and some Christians in the area.

So cutting off funds isn't going to help anything the only way we are going to stop them is kill them all.

2007-09-11 13:15:59 · answer #5 · answered by WCSteel 5 · 2 0

Bush funds the Saudis because he believes the Saudis will react in our favor re Iran.
He fails to see a rapidly growing cohesion between most of the countries that comprise the Middle East.

2007-09-11 13:41:07 · answer #6 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1 1

The overwhelming majority of the terrorist funding comes through small charities that are linked to the radical extremists.

Movement of large sums of money are easily tracked, and the terrorists know that. They would much rather get a dollar a day from a network of small charities (let's say $10,000 a day) then get a check for $100 million from some rich Saudi.

2007-09-11 13:13:00 · answer #7 · answered by cbmttek 5 · 3 2

Saudi Arabia. They made a deal with Pakistan for nuclear weapons, so it is OK. We don't want to get them to riled up or they might give a nuclear bomb to their terrorists to use here in America.

2007-09-11 13:13:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

all of the following are probably funding some of the hard cases in Iraq:

Iran
wealthy Saudis
Syria

Saddam Hussein [billions were stolen or looted and allocated to funding 'resistance']

fools in America who are taken in by phoney charities
ordinary Iraqis who are kidnapped for ransom
America -- our weapons and projects are stolen (from)

and for all we know, the immigrant next door

***
Here's the list of who probably isn't funding the hard cases in Iraq:

Israel
Kuwait

That's probably about it.

2007-09-11 13:16:08 · answer #9 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 0 2

I once heard: "Conserve gas - starve a terrorist" and it is making more sense to me all the time. To bad the Liberals are blocking drilling for oil in ANWR, we could use that oil, even if only for strategic reserves.

2007-09-11 13:18:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers