Yeah, tired of that question among other things. It's like they're stuck on stupid past the point of return.
BTW, the Libs think our troops are terrorists. They've said it time and time again.
2007-09-11 12:45:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by bonsai_kitty66 2
·
5⤊
11⤋
If a liberal really wants to know the true definition of a terrorist , then they should ask the relatives of the people the terrorist killed on 9/11/01 ?
2007-09-12 01:52:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you offer a definition of "terrorist" then there is a starting point for a discussion. I don't think anyone can define "terrorism" objectively. Prove me wrong.
I think it would be much better if the term was abandoned. It does nothing to solve the problems of the world, and a great deal to obscure them. But again, prove me wrong. Give an objective definition of terrorism...
2007-09-11 20:02:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by student_of_life 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Since the libs brave leader slick willie doesnt even know how to define the word IS, how in the world would you think the libs would be able to define terrorist, its only been 6 yrs since they "terrorists" started this war. You know they are slow learners.
2007-09-11 20:36:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by simpleokie.blogspot.com 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
It never gets old here those idiots(Reps) change their definitions based on today news story. If yesterdays definition makes them look hypocritical, they just change it, regardless of how stupid they look.
How many times are the Reps and Bush groupies going to preach about winning the war when not ONE SINGLE REPUBLICAN, including Bush, can define victory for us in Iraq. Isn't that the most disturbing thing of all? It is to everyone except the brain washed cult members of the Republican party.
Republicans are so backwards in their beliefs that they can't keep them aligned. So many beliefs and agendas directly conflict with one and other which is why they can't keep their story straight. Why do hear so many Reps say things like, "that's just liberals bias" or "I don't recall" when they're backed into a corner.
I would be absolutely embarrassed to be associated with the Republican party.
2007-09-11 19:52:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Well, actually it's an attempt at an easier question... asking Reps to list/define the 18 points for measuring success of the surge and the exit strategy for Iraq just didn't produce significant answers.
2007-09-11 19:56:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by sagacious_ness 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
you must be on here 24/7 to ask a question like that.
I pop on often enough here, but I've never seen that question ("Define a terrorist?") from either a liberal OR a Republican.
Do you have recurring dreams of new questions being asked on here? Would that be why you seem to see that question so often?
2007-09-11 20:47:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lily Iris 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
The left has a problem acknowledging the London train and bus bombings of 7/7.
Or the Spanish train bombings of 3/11.
And the attempted terrorist attacks last month in London and Scotland.
I could go on recounting the numerous acts of violence perpetrated against the West by an enemy who practically has to beg for recognition from the left wing element.
2007-09-11 19:52:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by illiberal Illuminati 3
·
3⤊
5⤋
Actually I never get tired of such questions. I am still waiting for answers to similar questions but they never seem to have any.
2007-09-11 20:15:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
We're just trying to see if you know.
FYI-- terrorism is a tactical method. It involves targeting nonmilitary targets to achieve political/military ends.
The rest of the stuff you neocons add to that definition is simply your own propaganda.
2007-09-11 20:08:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I know I will never get tired of them posing the question to Reps "Where is Osama and why haven't you caught him yet?"
2007-09-11 19:49:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
4⤊
2⤋