Bush on wire-taps and the US Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfbRcedmqvY
2007-09-11 12:05:06 · 13 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hillary lied about her husband and wire taps.
Clinton Executive Order in 1995:
"the Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order"
http://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayEO.cfm?id=EO_12949_
Clinton Had No Warrant Searches and liberals had no constitutional problem with it. They had no outrage when Clinton's executive order actually called for warrantless searches of people and possessions. Clinton's EO went far further than what liberals are currently upset about.
Clinton wouldn't need to write the EO unless he wanted to do no warrant searches.
2007-09-11 12:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
at the start, a wiretap is listening to a verbal replace on a telephone. This software would not try this till a telephone quantity belonging to a everyday terrorist, or suspected terrorist, makes or gets a decision to or from the US. 2d, they don't choose a warrant to "faucet" calls from remote places nationals. the completed beef with this software is that one and all cellular telephone calls are routed interior the direction of the US. The left claims that this makes the calls "relatives calls", regardless of if the call originated remote places. so which you notice, this is not a lie.
2016-11-10 04:14:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it does appear that his lips were moving, so I would have to say YES.
Wolf, I have never spoken to a terrorist on the phone, or mailed them a letter, but the government has some fetish about making sure my mail is sent to me opened, along with many people who live in my area.
If they are going to open our mail, do you think they aren't going to tap our phone calls?
Why the heck do you think so many people had problems the past few years with their phones ringing out of the blue, just once, without anyone calling, no caller ID, and no possibility to do anything but *69 the last phone number that did appear on caller ID? Must have been the lawnmower man huh??
2007-09-11 18:08:20 · answer #3 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, a wiretap is listening to a conversation on a telephone. This program doesn't do that until a telephone number belonging to a known terrorist, or suspected terrorist, makes or receives a call to or from the US.
Second, they don't need a warrant to "tap" calls from foreign nationals.
The whole beef with this program is that all cell phone calls are routed through the US. The left claims that this makes the calls "domestic calls", even if the call originated overseas.
BTW Chi, you answered this question yourself a while back. Are you running out of material?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Asn_thvhA_OSdZuAg08DXlHty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20070907202954AAok2wp&show=7#profile-info-be8e24f50abc7e550004c9578ed470d7aa
2007-09-11 12:29:13 · answer #4 · answered by madd texan 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Of course he did! He's been lying since he came into office in 2000! Even his entry into the presidency was a lie!
2007-09-11 12:11:55 · answer #5 · answered by patrick 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hey, wiretaps, stealing 900 FBI files, what's the difference?
2007-09-11 12:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by Hillary Clinton 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No.
Bush has never been caught in a lie about anything.
You may be confused with Clinton.
Democrats are in a Rage about Wiretapping Terrorists.
Evidently, many Democrats talk with Terrorists on the phone.
Why can't you Democrats just write the Terrorists letters????????
2007-09-11 12:10:20 · answer #7 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
No question about it.
Funny how the far right moonbats deny he lied without even looking at the video.
2007-09-11 12:14:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Thank your politicians for the Patriot Act.
2007-09-11 12:10:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Bush has lied about a lot of things!
2007-09-11 12:09:17 · answer #10 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋