Your question does not practice individuality and therefor is not scientific as is not answer number three, the sexist answer. Political philosophy is philosophy, but the notion for applying the word 'political' is to force a reaction in the mind the illusion of specialty. For its simplest description is the relation of people to each other, whatever that time and place and people is subject. No reasonably competent human, good or evil, is void of a political philosophy, whether understood as political or not, or philosophy or not. The most common or popular notion is procedure and purpose of and for the state authority, whatever its organic nature may be.
e.g. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/prconten.htm Hegel's Philosophy of Right
Analytical Table of Contents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niccol%C3%B2_Machiavelli Niccolò di Bernardo dei Machiavelli (May 3, 1469 – June 21, 1527) was an Italian diplomat, political philosopher, musician, poet, and playwright. He is a figure of the Italian Renaissance and a central figure of its political component, most widely known for his treatises on realist political theory (The Prince) on the one hand and republicanism (Discourses on Livy) on the other.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourses_on_Livy
The Discourses on Livy (Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy) is a work of political history and philosophy composed in the early 16th century by the famed Florentine public servant and political theorist Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), best known as the author of The Prince. Where The Prince is devoted to advising the ruler of a principality, i.e., a type of monarchy, the Discourses purport to explain the structure and benefits of a republic, a form of government based on popular consent and control. It is considered almost unanimously by scholars to be if not the first, then certainly the most important, work on republicanism in the early modern period.[1]
2007-09-11 15:36:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Psyengine 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a man's political philosophy. And then, there's a woman's political philosophy.
One is aggressive, territorial, and winning as a prize. This is but a fragment. There is also a paternal sense of welfare.
The latter is compassionate, quick to compromise, and a maternal instinct at the forefront.
This is my view.
2007-09-11 13:19:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Marguerite 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every political leader knows what is right and what is wrong.There is no political philosophy , only a philosophy of life.
2007-09-11 11:59:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have the influence and connections to vote themselves to power and respectable people generally wont like to associate with such people so our political system is completely dominated by these guys . what can be done ? 1. Eradicate poverty 2. Streamline our Justice system and make it more powerful 3. Eradicate corruption 4. Include a minimum credible educational qualification as a pre-requisite for entering politics
2016-05-17 09:15:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends on what political leaders your talking about
2007-09-11 11:46:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel 2
·
0⤊
1⤋