Question to those who think liberal political views are "unamerican"...?

Question

I often hear people on here saying that liberals are "unamerican" and that they should support our president regardless etc. ect.

I was just wondering whether this will change when a democrat gets in after next election. Will you instantly accept them because they are your president or will liberals be able to call you "unamerican" then because you don't like it?

Answer 1

Witness their words and actions during the last Clinton presidency,and see how they're already acting as regards Hillary Clinton or any other Democratic candidate.They know that the next president will be Democrat,so they're already preparing their smears and slanders that will last as long as a Democrat holds the office.

They have no real justification for the stupidity and criminality of the Bush Administration,therefore they attack the left with lies,spend millions on investigations that,when they can't find any wrong doing,intrude on private lives and turn sexual acts into crimes,unlike the criminal sexual acts their side commits with a sick regularity.

Answer 2

I think you know better than to use logic in an arguement such as this.

I have found MOST of the conservatives on this site to be intelligent, educated people that are willing to discuss thier views without hosility or rancor. The few 'neo-cons' that get militant about thier views are a minority. Alas, thier actions stand out because they are so obnoxious and vocal.

They remind of a drunk, rabid NFL fan. When thier team is winning, all you hear is 'Yeah, you suck, your team sucks, we will beat everyone and win the Superbowl.' Then, once this team is being hopelessly beat, you don't hear anything but 'Well, if the refs had made the right call, and if our running back hadn't gone down, etc.....'

In short, these people are 'sore winners' and they will undoubtably be 'sore losers' as well.

Answer 3

If History is anything to go by they will forget the words they speak now soon.
"I cannot support a failed foreign policy. History teaches us that it is often easier to make war than peace. This administration is just learning that lesson right now. The President began this mission with very vague objectives and lots of unanswered questions. A month later, these questions are still unanswered. There are no clarified rules of engagement. There is no timetable. There is no legitimate definition of victory. There is no contingency plan for mission creep. There is no clear funding program. There is no agenda to bolster our over-extended military. There is no explanation defining what vital national interests are at stake. There was no strategic plan for war when the President started this thing, and there still is no plan today"
--Rep Tom Delay (R-TX) (Referring to Clinton sending troops to Bosnia)
Clinton's efforts to quell the war in the Balkans "defeated Al Qaeda when it had attempted to take over Bosnia by having its fighters dominate the defense of the breakaway state from Serbian attacks."
The Clinton administration stopped Iraqi terrorism against the United States, through military intervention. It stopped Iranian terrorism against the United States, through covert action. It stopped the al-Qaida attempt to have a dominant influence in Bosnia. It stopped the terrorist attacks at the millennium. It stopped many other terrorist attacks, including on the U.S. embassy in Albania. And it began a lethal covert action program against al-Qaida; it also launched military strikes against al-Qaida.

Hmm,Tom Delay doesn't seem very concerned about emboldening our enemies at all and likewise Clinton never questioned Tom Delay's patriotism nor did the"liberal" media.No one called him a traitor like happens now to everyone who dares to question,let alone critisize any part of the failed white house Iraq strategy.No liberal radio hosts went after him nor did any other "liberal"broadcast.

Answer 4

You make a very interesting point...most of the politicians are so short sighted and dogmatic that they dont dare step out from party lines and stand up for what they believe in, or what the truth is. I give a lot of credit to the Republicans that have spoken out about Bush and his policies, and they will get my votes (if possible) in upcoming elections.

I wish people would realize that both parties have some really screwed up and contradictory views...

Answer 5

I think that any political views, whether liberal or conservative, supportive of the President or dismissive of him, are distinctly 'American' since Free Speech is a distinctly American right.

I do not support those people who seem to think that one's right to Free Speech should be taken away if they don't support the same viewpoints as your own. It is THEY who are un-American. Disagree with me? Fine. But don't call me un-American. The power to dissent is the beating heart of this great country.

Answer 6

you're actually not likely to locate approval of "government mandated charity" interior the bible through fact government grew to become into extremely distinctive 2000 years in the past. you purely can not evaluate a well known democratic republic with prevalent suffrage to an absolute monarchy or an aristocratic republic. the myth says that a guy or woman's salary is an contract between him and his enterprise considering that grew to become into the time-honored felony convention of the time, no longer through fact Jesus felt that this grew to become into suitable. Jesus taught compassion for the undesirable, lived as a homeless beggar and indiscriminately condemned every person who grew to become into wealthy. With that throughout the time of recommendations, are you able to truly tell me that if a governmental device of redistributing wealth greater effectively, greater continuously, and greater broadly had even been conceived of on the time, Jesus does no longer have been fascinated with it? actuality is, if Jesus grew to become into alive on the instant, he'd be a socialist. i'm no longer asserting that to declare any style of legitimacy for my component, i'm a conservative myself, and an atheistic one at that, yet Jesus' teachings are maximum congruent with the values held by ability of pacifistic socialists, no longer conservatives.

Answer 7

You are not unamerican because you dont agree with everything Bush stands for. You are considered unamerican when you overstep the boundary between disagreement and disrespect.

Answer 8

No more unAmerican than they would be unEuropean or unAsian. Why would a political view of any kind be against any continent? makes no sense.

Answer 9

I am an American Hispanic,who votes Conservative,i would support any American president,who puts the American nation,and American people,before the feelings of muslims,mexicans,europeans,this nonsense of p.c. policy's favored by liberals will be the death of millions of innocent lives,American,and world citizens,liberals do not understand that bullies of the world,like those of grade school,will only be stopped by force,liberals should know this,as i am sure they were victims of bullies,in their childhood,thus their hate for military might.

Answer 10

Ever notice the people that say you must stand behind the president no matter what are the same ones that were constantly attacking Clinton when he was president?

I guess it only applies to republican presidents.