English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

As long as the lieberal biased media keeps her covered from scrutiny and non stop investigative reporting she has nothing to worry about.

In other words, she won't be treated like a pub..

Her ties to Communists are well known.

Liebeals are the enemy from within.

2007-09-11 10:02:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

What scandal?
Democrats don't have a clue to what a scandal is if it involves a Democrat!
It is only a scandal if it comes from the OTHER side of the isle.
No Democrat and no mainstream news source will report on it until FORCED to do so.

2007-09-11 17:10:34 · answer #2 · answered by Philip H 7 · 1 0

Why should they be concerned? the main stream media is not going to investigate it------if republicans try to there will be such an outcry of politicising the issue. You would think this would be a great issue for the other democratic candidates to exploit----but none of them have said a word. Are they concerned about their lives?

If this had been Thompson or Gulianni it would have been a different story.

2007-09-11 17:08:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm not democrat but I don't think they are too worried. The laws need to change so no one can give more than $500 to a candidate.

2007-09-11 17:02:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It does not count when it involves Democrats.

2007-09-11 17:09:39 · answer #5 · answered by Quickie D 3 · 1 0

Not anymore than I'm concerned about romney's.

2007-09-11 17:02:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

Not really. It's sort of like how Bush received bundled funds from Johnson (Family First) . . . I don't think he knew it was illegal at the time . . .

2007-09-11 17:03:19 · answer #7 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 0 3

no because there is no scandal

2007-09-11 17:24:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers