English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If Bush had done even 1 single thing he promised this country, we would never have had to hear from this old spook ever again...

And it is a FACT that Bush has shaken hands with more members of Bin Laden's family than he has shaken the hands of democrats...

2007-09-11 07:59:52 · 18 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Terrorism threats shown to increase public support for Republicans:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/10/31/wus31.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/10/31/ixnewstop.html

2007-09-11 08:20:30 · update #1

18 answers

It makes me wonder if the Bush Regime found a OBL look-alike to make the video.

2007-09-11 08:16:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

First, the thing that has allowed America to progress socially is the ability for everyone to have freedom of speech. Don't knock it. There always has to be alternative views. It's how we develop our own objective opinions so we can best steer ourselves in the right direction. Obama was quick to recognize this when he said he will listen even when views differ. And finally, stop generalizing democrats and republicans. It could be considered narrow minded, and an unproductive way of looking at things. Consider the unity that was in Nazi Germany Consider some reading on the Seperation of Power doctrine

2016-05-17 07:25:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The rest of Bin Ladens family are not terrorists,so why does it matter if Bush knows them. I would rather shake hands with OBL's family members than most Dems too,so I can't blame Bush on that. And the truth is that 90% of OBL's statements sounded like they were right from the DNC handbook.Can you help it if 90% of what the DNC believes in OBL believes in too?

AD

2007-09-11 08:11:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Well if you want to get right down to it, we wouldn't be in ANY of this if Clinton had taken OBL into custody when the Sudanese offered him up on a silver platter! But Clinton didn't think he had the legal right to hold him. Don't believe me??? Read and listen for yourself IN HIS WORDS: http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/9/165600.shtml

"At the time, 1996, he [Bin Laden] had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan." -President Bill Clinton, 2002

2007-09-11 08:16:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 3 2

Since Bin ladin and the democrats have some of the same goals it is only logical to associate them. The main similarity is the fact that both of them wish America to lose the war on terror.

2007-09-11 08:09:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

Gore went to a forum hosted by the Bin Laden's and bad mouthed the US. a couple years ago. Remember. Birds of a feather.

2007-09-11 08:09:54 · answer #6 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 5 2

You are a fool.......Slow down and look at your headline.....and then let us all compare OBL most recent rhetoric with what America`s republicans and America`s democrats are saying these days......Do the the homework.....as I laugh at you........OBL recent cowdung uttering mimic those of today's democratic party....Nice try there, sport.

2007-09-11 08:11:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yeah, that's not a biased source you've given us at all... Terrorists have, on more than one occasion endorsed the Dems publicly. Terrorists know that the Dems don't have the stones to fight and kill them. It's a sad fact.

2007-09-11 08:27:23 · answer #8 · answered by ks 5 · 0 2

Bin Laden's comments sounded like he got them from CNN. He sounded to me like the majority of the left wing liberal loonies who are the Democrat party.
I would not shake hands with any of them, if I could avoid it.

2007-09-11 08:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by regerugged 7 · 6 2

While you're at it, blame Clinton. He is the one who was too busy betting a bj in the Oval Office instead of going after Osama, who was a danger to US interests even then.

2007-09-11 08:08:24 · answer #10 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 5 2

fedest.com, questions and answers