if not gen. patraues...?

Question

america, then who should we put our faith in the truth in, regarding the situation in iraq? please name one person more credible than him. reps and dems alike who question the generals loyalty, give me one name of who is more trustworthy.

Answer 1

I go along with you. The general has nothing to gain or lose, no matter what is in his report. He is not running for political office.Need I say more/

Answer 2

Try this list of Generals that conservatives have called traitors and that AREN'T TIED TO THE BUSH ADMIN

General Anthony Zinni
General Charles Swannack
Major General John Batiste
Marine Corps Lieutenant General Gregory Newbold
Army Major General Paul Eaton

Or how about these former Bush Admin officials -- one of whom is a terrorism expert

Richard Clarke
Paul O’Neill
John DiIulio

Answer 3

I think the facts speak for themselves. All the Democrats & Moveon.Org people can do is yell "Liar Liar", but indisputedly there have been more areas secured, more cooperation from the Iraqi Sheiks, more AlQaida killed, more weapons discovered.
The sad thing is that Democrats are openly and heavily vested in our military's failure. I can't fathom how any American, no matter how much you despise our president or his policies, can root for our failure and contest our successes.

Answer 4

If not Petraeus, then whatever fine person behind him next in line that the military can offer. The military is not a democratic institution. It's higher level personnel earn their position by a lifetime of service. They do not campaign and are not political. If you can't trust those people, who can you trust?

Answer 5

United Nations who were ignored by the Pentagon but they only hear what they want to hear, its selective listening

Answer 6

I say Bill Clinton. HAHA

Answer 7

How about someone that is independent and not 100% dependent on the President for his job.......

If you had a boss that was known to fire those that disagreed with him, what would you do?

Answer 8

me