Was there work done? How does the employer report this to the government if no money was exchanged in this relationship?
2007-09-11
06:18:08
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Dave B
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I guess I was just asking how the government views the definition of "work." In physics, no work is done until distance has been traveled. No matter how much actual physical work you expend on trying to move an object, if it doesn't move, technically no work is done. In law, if heard you really can't sue unless there was an injury. Similarly, we could postulate that no actual work can be done without the money exchanging hands and being accepted. If money is not accepted, in reality, it's a volunteer service, and if the government does collect taxes, those taxes collected could be considered questionable since no money actually changed hands. How can government charge you taxes on money you never received? If it is done due to their loophole, I understand, but from an ethical standpoint I would find fault in the tax law.
The story behind this is I don't really believe they should have to pay me for training which really didn't yield much result for them.
2007-09-11
12:17:38 ·
update #1
Also, it would just reflect another "short job" on my application which wouldn't help in future interviews. I think it would be best for both of us to just call the training volunteer or unpaid since they didn't technically tell me it was paid anyway. I'm not sure at what point in time things are reported to the government. The business contract between the employer and I is between us, until things are reported. If we both mutually agree to nullify the business contract and never have an exchange of money, I think this is our choice.
2007-09-11
12:24:02 ·
update #2