none
2007-09-11 06:25:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Heather 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
not one building has fallen or collapsed due to fire. the oklahoma city building was a bombing victim, but it didn't collapse, it just had it's walls blown out. I think the asker is making a statement as to another conspiracy theory. could be, though. A building on fire would not just all of a sudden collapse due to the heat stresses and jet fuel. damn bush
2007-09-12 10:26:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ron197192064 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Okla
This is the only thing that comes close to comparison, but it didn't change our lives as much as 9/11.
2007-09-11 14:34:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In addition to the 110-floor Twin Towers of the World Trade Center itself, numerous other buildings at the World Trade Center site were destroyed or badly damaged, including 7 World Trade Center, 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, the Marriott World Trade Center and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. The Deutsche Bank Building across Liberty Street from the World Trade Center complex was later condemned due to the uninhabitable, toxic conditions inside the office tower, with deconstruction scheduled for completion in September 2007. The Borough of Manhattan Community College's Fiterman Hall at 30 West Broadway was also condemned due to extensive damage in the attacks, and is slated for deconstruction. Other neighboring buildings including 90 West Street and the Verizon Building suffered major damage, but have since been restored. World Financial Center buildings, One Liberty Plaza, the Millenium Hilton, and 90 Church Street had moderate damage. Communications equipment, such as broadcast radio, television and two-way radio antenna towers, were damaged beyond repair. In Arlington County, a portion of the Pentagon was severely damaged by fire and one section of the building collapsed.
***Excuse me!! I totally misunderstood your question!!
2007-09-11 13:31:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Georgia Peach 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
I would think you would need to include the factor of being hit by an airliner full of jet fuel, if you are planning to do some sort of comparison.
2007-09-11 14:12:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by ghouly05 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Twin Towers did not fall due to fire, but to structural failure.
2007-09-12 12:12:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
how many high-rise buildings were ever struck by a 767...? Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it couldn't have happened.
2007-09-11 14:37:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Greg 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
the towering inferno!
oh wait...
2007-09-11 15:09:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by richiel101 2
·
1⤊
0⤋