2007-09-11 06:02:19 · 54 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because she is a Communist...........
2007-09-11 06:05:20 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 12⤊ 9⤋
Hillary was put in charge of ONE thing when Bill was president, health care reform. She gave us nothing. Her performance was so bad, Bill did not put her in charge of anything every again. If he does not trust her, why should we?
Hillary was made the laughing stock of the USA by Bill. Then she plays the innocent wife who had no idea what Bill was up to. If she can not keep track of her "man" she certainly can not keep track of an entire nation. Or she lied about not knowing, in which case she is no better than Bill when it comes to lies.
Hillary is a gun grabber. For many, that alone is enough reason not to want her as president.
Hillary has a temper that is unbelievable. Read the books, "Dereliction of Duty" (About Bill) and "The Truth about Hillary" (About Hillary). They both say she has a temper that could scare off Mike Tyson.
She comes across as a man with long hair. If she has some feminine attributes, she keeps them well hidden. She wears pant suits almost all the time. Try to find a full length picture of her in a dress. It will be quite a long search.
She lets her underlings do stuff and then when they get caught, she acts as if she had no idea what they were up to. She carries the idea of "plausible deniability" to a new level.
Lastly, she is like Bill. She will not take a stand, issue a statement or introduce a bill without first conducting an opinion poll to make sure it will maintain her popularity. Good, bad or indifferent, it is all about her, not about what is right.
2007-09-11 06:18:23 · answer #2 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
When someone is as disingenuous as Hillary is, they project themselves in such a way that most people find repulsive. For example, while the Queen and Bill got off on the Whitewater thing, what wasn't well publicized was that anyone who had any knowledge of the details surrounding Whitewater, they either committed suicide, died in mysterious "accidents", etc. Further, Hillary achieved some truly miraculous trades in the agricultural futures markets like pork bellies, live hogs, etc., before she got into politics. Trouble was, she consistently picked the EXACT highs and lows in her trades and made huge profits. She had virtually no trading experience beforehand. As a professional trader myself, this is impossible UNLESS the trades get altered by the broker to certain prices after they occur. This is what is believed to have happened in her case and it is widely believed she paid off the brokers to do this. There of course are many more examples of her treachery, but she is one creepy, phony and dangerous human being.
2007-09-11 07:52:14 · answer #3 · answered by maxman71 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Where to begin?
First, she's 'married' to the man who was too busy getting his knob polished to do anything about the 1st WTC attacks or the attack against the U.S.S. Cole or the tragedy in Somalia ( Blackhawk Down ) or anywhere else Americans were attacked by Islamofascists for 8 years.
Second, during the Whitewater investigation, she claimed for 2 years that she didn't possess the billing records from the Rose law firm. They were in her private residence in the White House. So at the very least she is guilty of obstruction of justice which should get her disbarred.
Third, she claimed Chelsea was jogging in lower Manhattan when the planes hit the WTC towers. She didn't bother to check out that ' fact ' w/ her daughter though. Chelsea was in a friend's apartment on Central Park South safely miles away on that morning.
Fourth, David Geffen, one of the Hollywood nobility, and a former fund raiser for the Clintons, was quoted as saying that " all politicians lie, but they (the Clintons) do it so easily it's disturbing. "
And that's just scratching the surface. I haven't even gotten into her ideaology, which is really scary.
2007-09-11 06:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by mikey 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Doesn't anyone get it?
You would have to be a fool to want a Bush or a Clinton in the White House!
We need a change.
And from some of the answers I've read here, some people just want the same kind of government we have had in these past two administrations.
Someone even said she was smart. She is just crooked!
And more over she is dangerous.
I for one don't want more of the same!
And I will be anti-hillary until I take my last breath!
2007-09-11 06:47:47 · answer #5 · answered by Working Man 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't hate Hilary, but I have to agree with the answer that Justgoodfolks gave, and I also have to say that I fall into the last category he mentioned. I don't like any of the front runners of either party for the very reasons he mentioned. But, I feel that of the front runners, Hilary is actually the least objectionable. If we had clean elections, with paper ballots...did away with diebold, and took the money totally out of the equation...to level the playing field, then people like Mike Gravel WOULD have a chance to win, and 'WE THE PEOPLE" would actually have a chance to take our country back from the so called Elites! The corruption really needs to stop....NOW! *sm*
2007-09-11 06:25:24 · answer #6 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because despite the widespread media's lack of accurate and responsible journalism... there is enough evidence in public records and other forums to the extent of the fraudulent nature, deceit and unchecked ambition that has always surrounded the Clintons. That's why they were sent packing in 2000! Putting Hillary back in the White House is like having everyone in the nation wearing dirty underwear.
Anti-Hillary for President? you betcha!
2007-09-11 06:30:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Goldenrae9 and her like are so far off center that if they move one step to the left or to the right they will fly off the magical merry-go-round.
Those of us on the right are very well acquainted with and what hillary represents. We had eight full years of seeing just how fast this country can, would and could go to hell in a hand basket. Hell we haven't fully recovered from Billies follies yet.
Oh, by and bye...it's not hatred we have towards hillary and the extreme left it's righteous indignation on loan from God.
2007-09-11 06:22:03 · answer #8 · answered by Barney 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
because she gave back 850,000 in contributions from a single donor. Thats equal to some other campaigns entire funding. All the while not even knowing this guy was a major scandal. Taken as she presents it she doesnt even notice a guy that could single handedly fund an entire presidential race.
Shes a flip flopper and has done so on the war so many times you know she is lying and we will stay there until the corporate sponsors that she does know say its ok to leave.
2007-09-11 06:07:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
People who don't like Hillary can roughly be divided into three categories.You got people who absolutely can't stand the woman for personal reasons.They don't really have a reason they just can't stand her.That happens to everyone so no need to elaborate.
The second group are the original Clinton bashers.This are the people who never got over Bills popularity.They still can't believe with all the lies they told and mud they threw Bill Clinton remained popular and loved by Americans and the world.Their reason to hate Hillary is solely because she's a Clinton.They are the crowd that says she's a socialist,throws the Clinton Body count around(a debunked fabrication) and supports every story no matter the source to damage her campaign.
The third group is left,more left than the Clintons.It's the group I can relate to most though I do support Hillary.They usually have a problem because she has very close ties with the pro Israeli lobby.They are opposed to her because she sells out to big business(was on the board of Wallmart),doesn't dare to take a stand or a firm stand on gay rights but always tries to stay in the middle.She does that on a lot of issues.They usually support more left leaning candidates like Kucinich or Gravel.
Those candidates are closer to me on the issues to but they don't have a chance to win.
Though I can see why and for a big part even can agree to the left critisism of Hillary I don't understand how it can go that far that it would turn into the hate some on the left express.Some say things like Hillary is Bush light or even Hillary is more of the same.
Bill wasn't a liberal by far when he was in the white house but Americans were better of and I'm sure they also will be much better of under a new Clinton Presidency than under any option the GOP has to offfer.
2007-09-11 06:06:58 · answer #10 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
The cry of Anti American will in straight forward terms serve to make the Italians extra obdurate. it is going to likely be the charm this is important as an self reliant evaluation of the info will ensue and can contain earlier undisclosed stuff. i think of the habit of the police in forcing a confession will carry lots weight as will the obtrusive loss of DNA on the homicide scene...Knox's DNA replaced into no longer discovered interior the room neither replaced into her boyfriends...the different guy is the only one that left DNA on the scene...his guilt is in his confession that he slept with Meredith yet her kinfolk don't have self belief she might have completed that as she replaced into complaining approximately Knox's carnal antics...i do no longer think of they have self belief all 3 did it. i think of Knox knew extra advantageous than she enable on yet do no longer think of she did the killing...tis somewhat a secret to me
2016-10-18 21:31:48 · answer #11 · answered by dunston 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋