They work hand in hand. So I would have to say both. The liberal socialist agenda being spread throughout the western world is minimizing terrorism as it goes and in each case the terrorists have already been there. It is a working machine to deceive free people and lead them into chaos.
2007-09-11 16:47:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Neither. The greatest threat to America is the continued silence of the majority of Americans. What I mean by that is most Americans don't lean so far left or right. Most Americans seem to be able to talk to each other and at least listen to and attempt to understand other points of view. Most Americans can agree to disagree at times but still love this country. The problem is we are allowing politicians free reign over us. I challenge anyone to find a politician who can solve a problem and not just put a band aid on it. They don't, and they won't make tough decisions when needed. They won't listen to us because we're not lobbyists with tons of money or a powerful union or corporation. We need to remind them of this by voting them out until they do what the MAJORITY wants them to do. We are at the point where we are letting our identity slip away to pacify the few. We are allowing our ideals and morals to decay to make the minority happy. That cannot and should not be tolerated. Remember these words also, "When in the course of human events....."
2007-09-11 06:07:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by matt b 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
The two are not exclusive of one another.
To socialize the United States would weaken it's ability to resist any assault.
It's happening right at the core of our being, academia.
Even at the pre-school level: (see source link).
The notion that the US and it's way of life is directly responsible for terror attacks is pervasive in our universities.
Views in our schools that is in opposition to that postulation are stifled regularly.
Conservative speakers are either not invited, not permitted or shouted down with the support of the institutional governance of those schools both public and private.
It is not moral, in direct contradiction to independent, free thought and illegal.
2007-09-11 06:12:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
In short term the ruling elite in longer term the lack of political awareness in majority of American people they are victims of false propaganda and covert schemes atleast since 1950.
2007-09-11 06:12:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dr.O 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
Liberal Socialist Agenda, because included in their agenda, is the toleration of terrorism, and more freedoms for those suspect to commit terrorist acts on America.
Liberals wanted to set Jose Padillia FREE! (Poor terrorists! America mistreats them so! Bad Bush!)
Had the Liberals had their way, excusing this man from his crimes against us, and setting him free to roam the country, more innocent people would be DEAD! Jose Padillia wanted to commit Jihad on you, Libs! Wake up! Before it's too late.
2007-09-11 06:40:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Considering that we are already socialists on some level (and have been for quite some time, mind you).
And considering that our founding fathers wrote up a very "liberal" constitution for us....
I'd say the terrorists.
Your way is not necessarily the "american" way just because we allow you to live as you choose.
2007-09-11 06:05:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by rabble rouser 6
·
6⤊
3⤋
A Day in the Life of Joe Republican
Joe gets up at 6 a.m. and fills his coffeepot with water to prepare his morning coffee. The water is clean and good because some liberal fought for minimum water-quality standards. With his first swallow of water, he takes his daily medication. His medications are safe to take because some liberal fought to ensure their safety and that they work as advertised.
All but $10 of his medications are paid for by his employer’s medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance - now Joe gets it too.
He prepares his morning breakfast, bacon and eggs. Joe’s bacon is safe to eat because some liberal fought for laws to regulate the meat packing industry.
In the morning shower, Joe reaches for his shampoo. His bottle is properly labeled with each ingredient and its amount in the total contents because some liberal fought for his right to know what he was putting on his body and how much it contained.
Joe dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is clean because some liberal environmentalist fought for the laws to stop industries from polluting our air.
He walks on the government-provided sidewalk to subway station for his government-subsidized ride to work. It saves him considerable money in parking and transportation fees because some liberal fought for affordable public transportation, which gives everyone the opportunity to be a contributor.
Joe begins his work day. He has a good job with excellent pay, medical benefits, retirement, paid holidays and vacation because some liberal union members fought and died for these working standards. Joe’s employer pays these standards because Joe’s employer doesn’t want his employees to call the union.
If Joe is hurt on the job or becomes unemployed, he’ll get a worker compensation or unemployment check because some liberal didn’t think he should lose his home because of his temporary misfortune.
It is noontime and Joe needs to make a bank deposit so he can pay some bills. Joe’s deposit is federally insured by the FSLIC because some liberal wanted to protect Joe’s money from unscrupulous bankers who ruined the banking system before the Great Depression.
Joe has to pay his Fannie Mae-underwritten mortgage and his below-market federal student loan because some liberal decided that Joe and the government would be better off if he was educated and earned more money over his lifetime. Joe also forgets that in addition to his federally subsidized student loans, he attended a state funded university.
Joe is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his farm home in the country. He gets in his car for the drive. His car is among the safest in the world because some liberal fought for car safety standards to go along with the tax-payer funded roads.
He arrives at his boyhood home. His was the third generation to live in the house financed by Farmers’ Home Administration because bankers didn’t want to make rural loans. The house didn’t have electricity until some liberal stuck his nose where it didn’t belong and demanded rural electrification.
He is happy to see his father, who is now retired. His father lives on Social Security and a union pension because some liberal made sure he could take care of himself so Joe wouldn’t have to.
Joe gets back in his car for the ride home, and turns on a radio talk show. The radio host keeps saying that liberals are bad and conservatives are good. He doesn’t mention that the beloved Republicans have fought against every protection and benefit Joe enjoys throughout his day. Joe agrees: “We don’t need those big-government liberals ruining our lives! After all, I’m a self-made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have.”
2007-09-11 18:37:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Liberals are what created u . s .. without an open suggestions u . s . might have never existed. Muslims on the different hand delight in what u . s . has to grant. You needless to say have not met any actual Muslims.
2016-10-10 09:24:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by czaplicki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Partisans
2007-09-11 06:19:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kermit 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
anyone who wonders why bin laden remains free to prepare the next attack on america need only look at this question where terrorists are compared with political enemies of the radical cons.
also anyone who thinks that bush doesn't share this sentiment are dreaming.
it is now a known fact that bush used the illegal wiretapping program almost exclusively to spy on his political opponents.
2007-09-11 06:06:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by nostradamus02012 7
·
7⤊
1⤋