Both Hillary and Obama voted LAST MONTH to expose bundlers and their backers. Do you think they will stick with it now that they are both beneficiaries of bundlers? Also, Can we all agree that this woman is another crooked Washington insider, or are there any other plausible possibilities. These are real (not hypothetical) questions. If you don't have a real answer, you can insult the asker, answer with a question or make a joke. Of course, any of these will get thumbs down.
2007-09-11 05:55:25 · 11 answers · asked by Raalnan5 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The New York Times reports that Hillary Clinton is returning the money to the 260 donors who were recruited by Hsu.
The Clinton campaign is hiring people to do background checks on bundlers.
2007-09-11 06:10:25 · answer #1 · answered by quest for truth gal 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No one will ever convince me that Hillary or anyone else in the Democratic party was unaware that Norman Hsu was wanted.
It did not take long before they decided that they would donate the money to charity, Hillary donated $23,000 the problem is that she reported that Norman Hsu gave $100,000, the actual figure is probably higher as she only reports on amounts of $100,000 and higher. Obama reports on everything $50,000 and higher. I believe that there will be an investigation and I believe that Norman Hsu will commit suicide (just like Vince Foster).
One of the questions that has not been asked is about the donations of the Paw family, Mr. Paw is a letter carrier for the US Postal Service, yet the Paw family managed to donate $278,000, how is this possible? I believe that the money was given to the Paw family so that it could be donated in their name; This is very illegal. By the way do you see any of the liberal websites or newspapers giving this any attention?
EDIT: Not to quest_for_truth
Funny that Hsu has been on the lam for 15 years and now that he has been caught Hillary and the rest of the dems are conducting searches. The only thing they are searching for is a way to protect their AZZ
2007-09-11 06:10:20 · answer #2 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm reading all these answers and it makes me wonder how the Far Left in this country will go to such extremes to defile President Bush's character. They will create and bounce these crazy conspiracy theories all over each other, and yet when the Clintons are linked to dishonest people and events they ignore it. They vote for them anyway. I think that says a lot about their own character.
2016-05-17 06:25:45 · answer #3 · answered by shery 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why did Hillary give back or donate to the charity only after Norman Hsu got caught?!
That should tell you what Democrats really are all about.....
2007-09-11 06:00:29 · answer #4 · answered by Samm 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Hsu's own donations were donated to charity,
some $850,000 of Hsu's bundled donations from others have been returned to the individual donors.
Soooo - are you going to pick the correct answer or the inflammatory rhetoric?
2007-09-11 06:02:39 · answer #5 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If she gives it back to a charity, I bet it will be either the Clinton Library or Move On.org
2007-09-11 06:03:36 · answer #6 · answered by nileslad 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I was wondering that myself. it certainly will not go back to him. I wonder if there was an accounting of who donated through this guy. otherwise I would not be surprised if it ends up in the DNC pot.
2007-09-11 06:01:22 · answer #7 · answered by lynne f 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Shes giving it to her favorite charity: Al Quieda
2007-09-11 06:01:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Various charities, as per the campaign laws.
2007-09-11 06:01:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Please do not tell me how to answer.A thumbs down threat doesn't bother me one bit.it wont be the first time.She will give to money,in secret,to her Adulterous Hubby and then he will give it back to her.You will never know.
2007-09-11 06:02:16 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋