Your opinion on Britney Spears' body at the VMAs?

Question

Do people seriously think she had an out of shape body? I thought she looked good (her performance was lacking...). The woman is the mother of two!

Sorry, I just can't understand the whole thing with her body...

I agree that she shouldn't have been wearing what she was wearing, but think about it, this is Britney Spears and it was MTV. Has she ever performed in anything other than something sexually provoking? Nope.

GypsyDane: The media is one big circuit of hypocrisy if you haven't noticed.

Madonna looks good? Which Madge are we talking about here, cause the one I've seen in recent pictures looks like a too thin waif that could use some food.

Answer 1

I think she looked great as well. Healthy.

Answer 2

The only two complaints I have about Britney's body is that the stomach had a slight bulge and the outfit was totally wrong for her.

But the mother of two children excuse doesn't fly with me. Look at Madonna. She gave birth to two children and is two decades older than Britney and she's definitely in shape. She can still pull off wearing skimpy outfits if she chooses to. Nelly Furtado has a little girl and her stomach is as flat as a pancake. I'm just saying Britney should have chosen a better outfit, but overall I don't think her body is bad.

You can call Madonna waifish if you want, but I brought her up as example of a woman that despite having two kids of her own, she's not out of shape, flabby or have a slightly bulging belly. What's Britney's excuse for her body not looking half as good as someone who's twenty years older than her?

Answer 3

One word. Britneys overall performance on the VMA'S final evening replaced into poor. Britney regarded fully bored in the process her entire overall performance. Her dance workouts have been sloppy. She forgot a number of the lyrics to her song. She didnt look mushy in any respect in that skimpy little outfit. Britney gave the impact of she replaced into squeezed down in that element. those 5 inch heels she had on didnt help the two. She gave the impact of she replaced into going to crumple in those issues. Sorry yet Britneys overall performance final evening replaced into atrocious as Simon Cowell might say. I felt embarrased for her. Britney isnt waiting for a comeback yet for my section. She cant sing the two.

Answer 4

I agree, her body looked good. She doesn't look thin as a rail like she used to. What is wrong with our society? They complain about how skinny the stars are & then pick Brittney apart.

I wonder what all of the young girls are thinking now since they're picking her apart because of her body. She had 2 kids close together for goodness sake. The media is not helping the young teens by calling Brittney fat. They need to realize that there's young girls all over who were already eating less & now are probably starving themselves...

Answer 5

I was in Las Vegas when the VMA's took place. I wish I hadn't been. The entire music industry is run by people who act like they're still in Kindergarten.

I don't even want to comment on whether or not she's in shape. I was appalled that a mother of two would perform publicly wearing only what she had on.

Answer 6

i think everyone just want a reason to hate her at the moment, if anythin i wish i could run over and give her a hug.
she is on a path of mental break down anyone that cant see that is deluded themselves!!

i mean, come on, ur right she is the mother of 2 young boys, she isnt as hot as wat she was but believe me if i ate half the things she ate i would expect to be alot bigger than her now!

i think she knows that no matter what she eats or how big she gets she can always get her body back maybe not as much as what it was, but with her money an that she can hire the best personal trainer about.

i also think alot of people think its great to be able to call her names at long last, after years of being jealous of her body.
alot of the women that slate her prob think well at least my man wont want a piece of her now!!!!

sad

Answer 7

I know lots of older women who have had two or three children who look better than Britney. It's not that she looked fat; but for someone who is a dancer and who has access to personal trainers and her own chef, she looks flabby and out of shape. She's got a beer belly, back fat, a double chin, fat arms, and her butt looks like a ham. Britney doesn't look like she's gained weight from having kids. She looks like she's bloated and out of shape from all the drinking, smoking and PARTYING. The worst part about her body at the VMA's was that she didn't need to wear that outfit, which was basically underwear, in the shape that she's in. Britney needs to put some damn clothes on!

Answer 8

Her body wasn't in the best shape it has ever been in but that is to be expected after popping out a couple of kids. Hey, if a girl had that body and she was a nice person, I definately wouldn't knock her back.

Answer 9

i think the body was fine, i dont buy into the media's idea of a good body. Her outfit was horrible, and so was the performance. calling her fat is uncalled for, but saying her performance was awful and should go down as one of the worst mistakes in musical performance history, that would be valid.

Answer 10

No, she looked fine. I mean, I don't see why she had to wear what she was wearing, and I think her slow moves helped accentuate what you so aptly pointed out, she's a mother of two. Personally, I feel sad for her. She's obviously a scared girl who wants help, but Hollywood doesn't allow for that kind of help in it's society. Brit's body looked just fine, and my wife agrees with me. She just looked like she didn't want to be there.

Answer 11

The problem is, people are comparing her to the young, no-kids Britney. So they see her now and she looks heavier than before.

Also, most of the complaints seem to be about her horrible performance, not her body necessarily. I didn't see it, but heard her dancing and lip-synching were awful.