English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

dnldslk's first two reasons pretty much explain it. Remember, this is colloquial speech. The point is not "getting it precisely right" as in communicating easily. So long as it is clear in the context that you mean to communicate a NUMERAL -- say you're telling someone a set of phone numbers-- they should have no difficulty in understanding you... and it's a lot quicker.

Actually, if you look at a few dictionaries, you'll find this use acknowledged. For example:

2. the Arabic cipher; zero.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/O
(third entry on the page, listing uses of "O" as a symbol)

2007-09-11 16:05:52 · answer #1 · answered by bruhaha 7 · 0 0

1. They look the same.
2. It’s faster to use a one syllable word than a two.
3. People like to fool around with language. It’s more fun that way.
4. People like to introduce a little weirdness to a rigid subject like math

2007-09-11 04:16:10 · answer #2 · answered by dnldslk 7 · 0 0

It should not be. That's why we have zeros and o's to distinguish the two.

You would not write there are n0 o's in the number 5.

You would write there are no 0's in the number 5.

2007-09-11 04:20:29 · answer #3 · answered by ghouly05 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers