English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How many people have to die in your unprovoked war of aggression before you become a bloodthirsty tyrant?

2007-09-11 03:54:55 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

There were more military deaths under Clinton than under Bush???!?!!!?!!!!????????

I guess we know what network YOU watch!

2007-09-11 04:07:59 · update #1

9 answers

Because he is neither blood thirsty nor a tyrant.............

2007-09-15 02:37:00 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 0 0

You know, this is just silly. Say what you want about Bush, he's not a tyrant. I don't have to fear being taken away in the middle of the night because of what I say here. I can practice the religion of my choice (or not) freely. I can take books out of the library without having to worry that the government is keeping track of them. Oh, yeah, I can't do that any more. But still, he's far from a tyrant, and to say he is doesn't help the debate. All it does is give ammunition to the conservatives to use against the majority of liberals who don't say things like this.

2007-09-11 04:02:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

By your reasoning we should have removed Billybob Clinton because there were more military deaths under his watch than we've seen under President Bush. I don't remember Clinton declaring war on anyone, except a bunch of impressionabl young women, and values, and morals, and honesty, and integrity.......you get the picture.

2007-09-11 04:06:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

cuz 4 sum reason we cant find a reason 2 have him impeach, but there was a reason 4 Clinton. Sry guess Bush has 2 sleep w/ his secertary :(

2007-09-11 16:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by elle 4 · 0 0

That is why we have a limitation to the length of time a president can be in office. If you don't like Bush's politics, then start reading up on the new candidates and VOTE!

2007-09-11 04:03:08 · answer #5 · answered by Candace C 5 · 2 1

This is where the American Left crosses the line of civil discourse, in my opinion.

This is where our US Rule of Law gets abused by the Left.

Believe anything you wish, but uphold our Rule of Law.

ADDED: Calling me "dear" does not civil discourse make. LOL. Regardless, I appreciate the effort. The US Constitution is governed by 3 bodies. It's called Separation of Powers. Before the Left blames Bush for anything it should look to the Democrats in Congress.

2007-09-11 04:02:22 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1 2

Ruth, dear, if our President upheld the law we wouldn't be where we are today....

2007-09-11 04:04:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Define "Moral".

2007-09-11 04:01:40 · answer #8 · answered by King 5 · 1 1

Not!~!

2007-09-11 04:01:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers