you will never know for sure what you were in violation of. they give no reason for their decisions. i had my account suspended for exactly what i was never sure of, i asked several time for y/a to be specific. all that i rec'd was a email saying that my appeal was denied.
i think that someone took exception to an answer of mine and looked up my questions and/or answers and complained. i rec'd 8 violation notices and then my account was suspended, all within 24 hours.
btw, i do agree with your assessment of bush. some of the posters to your question make me laugh. an insult from a con reads like a compliment to me.
all it takes is someone with a grudge. under the new format, you do not have an opportunity to add details, it is either or.
2007-09-18 13:43:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by tomjohn2 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Greetings. I seem to remember from a much off previous the place we've been a freer those that it is not slander to tell the reality, whether actually to no longer the liking of the guy addressed via it. Now that's against the regulation to be common here. Lies are the familiar and not the frowned upon comments. yet once you like to be a American under this government you the two close up and pass quietly to the concentration camps like the Jews did in international conflict 2 or you talk out. i presumed it grow to be the american thank you to talk the reality regardless of the outcomes. and that i think of that's a extraordinarily honest description to call somebody in charge for the deaths of over a million million civilian Iraqi's a mass murderer. what number ought to die for the mass area to be proper? And in accordance to common regulation a pacesetter is in charge for the strikes finished under his orders. Obeying orders isn't a protection.
2016-11-14 22:47:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Violation - No. Incorrect analogy Yes.
Criminal- No.
Now just because someone (even many) else does an action does not make it correct. No matter how many people say you beat your wife, I'm not going to say it unless I have more than their word or opinion.
What I would say is, you blame Bush for not providing the legislative bodies with information. Those legislative bodies you excuse so flipantly of guilt, have access to the same information Bush has and they get it from the same sources. They do not need to go through Bush to get it either. There is (in case you didn't know) a Senate and House Intelligence Sub-Comittee. Each of them get regular briefings. Each can request information on any matter of security. But THEY are the only ones who have access to this information. They can't have their staff go read it and tell them what it says.
I'd say you are definitly a threat. But not to the President. Just to every other opinionated partisan liberal. You just reinforce the already formed opinion they have the Republican is always at fault. And Democrats NEVER are wrong. If you don't believe that --Just ask a Democrat. They will tell you in no uncertain terms- Democrats are never wrong. *LOL* They may even accuse you of having a low IQ just for suggesting Democrats could possibly be wrong.
2007-09-11 05:12:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by namsaev 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
yahoo will review your account and if they think you violated the tos they will let you know. As for being reported to the FBI....thats crap, the FBI has bigger fish to fry than someone calling the president a mass murderer....there are people out there doing far worse. Whoever told you they reported you to the FBI is full of it.
2007-09-11 03:44:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do not see the president as a mass murderer. I see him as our protector. I see him as the vanquisher of tyrants. I see him as the Commander-in-Chief. I see him as the provider of security and stability in Iraq until the politicians can sort out the way the government works and are able to handle things themselves.
Actually, I do not think you are of much consequence to the FBI. Have you threatened the president? I do not think that by voicing your opinion, such as it is, that you are in violation of the Terms of Service, either.
.
2007-09-11 03:47:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I once said Bush was a moron and got a violation for insulting "another user"!
2007-09-12 08:35:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by K. Marx iii 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm not sure about Y!A TOS, but you are violating the truth if you do that.
2007-09-11 03:42:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by credo quia est absurdum 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
your a low life and not a man
2007-09-17 07:20:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO, you take advantage of the freedom of speech that others gave you!
2007-09-11 03:51:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋