when i heard all the fuss i expected to see a truly shambolic performance but it wasnt that bad i dont think. sure she was hardly moving around the stage much, doing little to cover the fact she was lip syncing and her performance had no omph in it that we are use to seeing but i have seen worse. also i dont think shes over weight at all..ok so she aint as toned as we are use to seeing her but i wouldnt mind having a figure like that.
2007-09-11 03:21:57 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
she has had 2 babies! any woman who has a body like that after carrying 2 kids is a lucky lady!!!! the plp calling her fat must be anorexic stick insects who have nothing better to do than slag off a girl who has curves in all the right places. losers! her performance definately lacked enthusiasm. i loved the song tho!
2007-09-11 03:51:57 · answer #1 · answered by *T*I*N*K*E*R*B*E*L*L* 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Britney was heavier and slower than we're used to seeing her, but she has been away for four years now and had two children in the meantime. Any woman would gain weight having two children so close together.
Britney does seem to be self-destructing. She turned down a duet with Justin Timberlake and the chance to record "Umbrella" which Rihanna got instead and had a monster hit with it. Now this disastrous performance at the VMAs. Not only that, Britney was seen wearing no knickers again after the show!
As Simon Cowell advised her: "Stay home, keep away from your idiot friends, eat some home-cooked food and get a dose of reality." Sound advice, whether Britney listens to anyone these days is another matter. I wish her well. Nobody wants to see Britney go the same way as Anna Nicole Smith, do they?
2007-09-11 08:06:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree that her body did not look as bad as everyone keeps saying. Sure, she gained weight her body still looked better than most peoples. I think it shows how critical people are of celebrities to maintain a certain body shape. It also shows how celebrities cannot have AN OUNCE OF FAT.
As for her performance, the hype may have made it worse than it seemed. It was more sad than comical. (I would have preferred comical). I guess what made it sad is it didn't look like she wanted to be up there. If she had tried and screwed up that would have been funnier.
Also, if this was supposed to be her "comeback" performance, it wasn't much of a comeback.
Basically, she looked lifeless up there. She stumbled a few times. And that HAS GOT TO BE one of the worst lip-syncing performances I have ever seen. Overall, it looked like she wasn't even trying which is shameful for someone who needed this to get back to the top.
2007-09-11 03:31:13 · answer #3 · answered by Keith 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Remember she’s a pop star and only 25. All performance stars get on stage with more energy then the energizer bunny and she use to be the same way. My mom could have done her moves even with her bad arthritis!. The performance was awful and she should have never worn that outfit. No one would be talking about her body if she would have hidden that tummy and a**. She’s not fat, just out of shape and there’s no excuse for any of it.
Her youngest will be a year old tomorrow. The only reason she’s flabby is because she just doesn’t care. It pathetic and really sad that she feels so bad about herself to sabotage her life like this. I hope she gets serious help soon.
2007-09-11 03:45:31 · answer #4 · answered by justmythoughts 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It wasn't awful as in if one of us were up there trying to do it, but Britney used to be such a good performer. She just looked completely unprepared and so compared to the dance moves we were used to seeing it look hideous. I can't believe all the scrutiny about her body though, the girl has had two kids in the last two years, and if she was a regular person she would look great. She's not as in shape as she used to be, but she's hardly fat.
2007-09-11 03:32:14 · answer #5 · answered by ○•○•Cassie•○•○ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is troublesome for me to respond to this, seeing how I watched it after all the terrible comments, so I went in with that. i think of that if i might have watched it the 1st time, stay, i does not have concept it replaced into terrible, whether it is no longer her maximum suitable. She did look truly lazy in it, basically getting into the process the motions. yet I do have some thing to assert approximately her discern. No, she does not have the athletic, ripped discern she did some years in the past, yet she isn't fat! I propose, come on! all and sundry is appearing as though she is extensive. human beings heavily could desire to get a grip. particular, she is a action picture star and her physique photograph is a factor of her interest, yet supply her a destroy! She isn't fat! GEEZ! circulate eat some CHEETOS!
2016-10-18 21:16:01 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they r compering it to her other perfomences
i dont think it was that bad she jus neede ore practice
i think she looked reli nerovouse on syage adn heard she cried as soon as she came off stage n its was horrible what sarah silvermen said about her babies
shes not over weight shes jus less tones than b4 adn compared 2 most of the other celebs there
i think she need a break from bein a celeb and a performer 2 get her life sorted out they shud jus leave hre alone 4 a bit
2007-09-11 03:45:22 · answer #7 · answered by minni 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Not fat but really bad performance compared to her past performances! She barely moved and she could at least done a good job Lip syncing but she didn't ! And her extensions are awful! Most celebrities you can't tell they have extensions but hers are awful!
2007-09-11 03:30:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
you're right, it wasn't that bad, but it wasn't great either, and she definitely had a poor choice of clothes. I think now that she's a mother, she could tone it down a bit. Madonna has, alot. I just think that she's trying to be somebody that she isn't anymore.
Oh, and she's not fat, she's just bigger in some parts due to having children. It comes with the territory.
2007-09-11 03:31:47 · answer #9 · answered by marberrysroom 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i was really disappointed with her performance! she was lacklustre,under prepared,looked dazed and confused in parts but i have to admire her resilience. to stage a comeback after such a public fall from stardom is brave beyond words. she could have worked on her moves and chosen something a little more flattering but hey ho, whats done is done!!!i think she was really nervous too and who the hell am i to criticise??? i hate even making speeches and certainly wouldn't try it wearing sequins and fishnets!!!
2007-09-11 03:38:58 · answer #10 · answered by fingerlickinchicken 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah i agree. they are basing her performance on what she has done in the past. when you are planning a comback yyou'd better do it big or stay home and in this case, she should have been practicing and working at her image instead of hitting the clubs with diddy. it's a shame too cuz the song is hot.
2007-09-11 03:28:08 · answer #11 · answered by Victoria J 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋