English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read that in another 30 or 40 years the North Polar bear is going to be extint, why cannot be transported to the Antartic?

2007-09-11 02:25:27 · 3 answers · asked by Carlos F 1 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

3 answers

there are no polar bears in south pole because polar bears only lives at cold northern hemisphere. It carnivor mean, polar bear need meat to lives. normally, seagull, sea lion is polar bear meal.

polar bear going to extint because of globar warming.
our planet hotter every year. so, by the area in north pole where the summer average temperature is about 0 - 5 celcius, the ice getting melt.

when this occur, polar bear habitat become small and small and small. when ice melting, the land is so limited for polar bear. when this happen, polar bear search the new habitat. but the new habitat not at north pole anymore, but must be the temp is warmer than north pole. even the new habitat is cold in winter, but the summer must much hotter and felt uncomfortable for polar bear to live.

even like polar bear go to verkhoyansk where the winter temperature -44celcius. but in summer, polar bear must die due to hot temperature. in july, this place can over 30celcius even the winter is extremely cold.

if polar bears go back to their home town (north pole), it will sink because north pole not a land. the ocean that form into ice melt anywhere at north pole.

so, if polar bear tranfer to south pole, what this bear gonna to eat? eat the ice? because at south pole, there is no permanent living things. if bird, only migration. human, only scientist to make research normally within 2 week. so, it will suffer there with no thing can be ate. there also no water for polar bear to drink. no sea at south pole. the ice cant be broke by human or polar bear to fishing the fish like at north pole because the south pole ice is about 2830m.

south pole also have extreme temperature rather polar bear native habitat. in siberia, still normal if temperature drop below -60.but polar bear habitat hardly experienced -60 and below. then, if polar bear come to south pole that winter average -60? not the lowest, but averge. the lowest normally could be
-70 -> -75 and higer every year. i dont know either polar bears can live at that temperature.

all contenent in antartica, doesnt have living things for polar bear if polar bears transfer here. 1 place only. at antartica peninsular or all place antartica that round by ocean.
but, still have prob here because polar bear will eat penguin.
then, polar bear survive, but penguin will extint?

that why god put polar bear at norhtern and penguin at southern.

2007-09-11 05:56:11 · answer #1 · answered by _Me_ 1 · 0 0

the respond approximately conduct etc. of seals is a sturdy element. evaluate besides that all of us animals circulate removed from the poles interior the iciness. Polar bears circulate around the lands of the north pole removed from the worst iciness temperatures. on the south pole they could no longer get very a strategies away. Polar bears are solid swimmers yet they in all likelihood does not have the potential to swim to the falklands and South usa. Bears does not stay to tell the tale on the South Pole as they coudln't get away the iciness climate.

2016-10-18 21:06:24 · answer #2 · answered by blide 4 · 0 0

As far as I am aware, there are no native bears at all in the southern hemisphere.
Transporting polar bears to the south seems like a good idea; but it could have disastrous effects on southern ecology, because the bears would have no natural enemies, and the resident wildlife no defence against them. We could then face the problem of some kinds of penguines becoming extinct.
Not a bad idea, though.

2007-09-11 02:37:56 · answer #3 · answered by AndrewG 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers