Do you think they'll try to impeach her before the inaguration?Even though Republicans will be a shrinking minority in Congress in 2009, they'll still try to impeach her.
2007-09-11 02:19:31 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Well there already is an FBI investigation underway for illegal campaign contributions. She is not even in office and the scandals are hitting already. Wonder what Ken Starr is doing?
2007-09-11 02:27:13 · answer #1 · answered by ken 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think they'll try to impeach her over her hairdo. Rush will talk about how her hair represents some sort of treasonous offense, and off they'll all go.
Normally, republicans respect the office of the president, unless that office is occupied by a democrat. In that case they'll impeach over lying about oral sex, as though that were some "high crime" or "treason." (The two reasons provided for impeachment). Note that Clinton was found innocent of either crime.
I also see the scandal mill is working overtime. Jack Abramoff's contributions to GOP coffers is all forgotten ancient history, but expect to see a big Whitewater revival. Or perhaps Ken Starr will spot a ketchup stain on Hillary's pant suit.
2007-09-11 09:05:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to the Republicans though, you can't question a president's authority, so they shouldn't.
However, impeachment is regarding criminal proceeding as President. That couldn't happen.
2007-09-11 02:26:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, she in simple terms mentioned that the Republicans did no longer prefer people to vote. I have no concept whilst she even listened to a Republican to come again up with this. maximum folk like her do no longer care what the Republicans ought to declare the bend and twist the words that come out of the Republicans mouth to lead them to sound undesirable. additionally assorted the Democrats wont pay attention to what the Republican ought to declare. they only care approximately what they ought to declare and each little thing the Republican ought to declare ability no longer something. this is not any longer the way our government is think to paintings, yet you comprehend they do no longer fairly care! i comprehend it fairly is definitely late yet I observed this and had to declare some thing. I observed some comments that mentioned the Republicans weren't telling the reality whether this is not any longer us!
2016-11-14 22:41:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
check the legal definition of impeachment dummie -- its in that old piece of paper u should have read b/4 u wrote ur question -- u people scare the devil out of me -- and ur the geniuses that are runnin this country into the ground
2007-09-11 02:26:24 · answer #5 · answered by de viking 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think a president-elect is impeachable. I also don't think a Clinton will ever again be president, at least I hope not!
2007-09-11 02:26:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
A. a president cannot be impeached before inaugeration.
B. there won't be any grounds on which to impeach her.
C. I suppose they can try, but it won't amount to anything.
2007-09-11 02:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We are going to have to wait until some aide gets caught eating at the presidental Y...
2007-09-11 02:27:03 · answer #8 · answered by Muley Bob 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No need.
She has zero chance of winning.
Their only chance is running Edwards.
2007-09-11 02:26:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i really doubt the republicans will do anything unless she does something impeachable.
unlike the libs we don't try to "get even" and invent phoney issues to try.
2007-09-11 02:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋